Page 260 - The Handbook of Persuasion and Social Marketing
P. 260
236 The Handbook of Persuasion and Social Marketing
at SSRN: Http://Ssrn.Com/Abstract=1866371 or Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.2139
/Ssrn.1866371.
Masten, Scott V., and Raymond C. Peck. Problem Driver Remediation: A Meta-
Analysis of the Driver Improvement Literature. Journal of Safety Research 35,
no. 4 (2004): 403–425.
McDermott, Laura, Martine Stead, and Gerard Hastings. What Is and Is Not Social
Marketing: The Challenge of Reviewing the Evidence. Journal of Marketing
Management 21, no. 5-6 (2005): 545–553.
Mongeau, Paul A. Another Look at Fear-Arousing Persuasive Appeals, in
Persuasion: Advances through Meta-Analysis, ed. Mike Allen and Raymond W.
Preiss (New York: Hampton Press, 1998): 53–68.
Mothersbaugh, David L., Bruce A. Huhmann, and George R. Franke. Combinatory
and Separative Effects of Rhetorical Figures on Consumers’ Effort and Focus in
Ad Processing. Journal of Consumer Research 28, no. 4 (2002): 589–602.
Mytton, Oliver, Alastair Gray, Mike Rayner, and Harry Rutter. Could Targeted
Food Taxes Improve Health? Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 61,
no. 8 (2007): 689–694.
Nelson, Jon P. Cigarette Advertising Regulation: A Meta-Analysis. International
Review of Law and Economics 26, no. 2 (2006): 195–226.
Nelson, Jon P. Alcohol Advertising Bans, Consumption and Control Policies in
Seventeen OECD Countries, 1975–2000. Applied Economics 42, no. 7 (2010):
803–823.
Nelson, Jon P., Estimating the Price Elasticity of Beer: Meta-Analysis of Data with
Heterogeneity, Dependence, and Publication Bias (January 14, 2013). Available
at SSRN: Http://Ssrn.Com/Abstract=2200492 Or Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.2139/
Ssrn.2200492.
Neumann, Mary Spink, Wayne D. Johnson, Salaam Semaan, Stephen A. Flores,
Greet Peersman, Larry V. Hedges, and Ellen Sogolow. Review and Meta-Analysis
of HIV Prevention Intervention Research for Heterosexual Adult Populations in
the United States. Journal of Acquired Immune Disease Syndromes 30, Supplement
1, July 1 (2002): S106–S117.
O’Keefe, Daniel J., and Jakob D. Jensen. The Relative Persuasiveness of Gain-
Framed and Loss-Framed Messages for Encouraging Disease Prevention
Behaviors: A Meta-Analytic Review. Journal of Health Communication 12, no. 7
(2007): 623–644.
O’Keefe, Daniel J., and Jakob D. Jensen. The Relative Persuasiveness of Gain-
Framed and Loss-Framed Messages for Encouraging Disease Detection
Behaviors: A Meta-Analytic Review. Journal of Communication 59, no. 2 (2009):
296–316.
O’Keefe, Daniel J., and Daisy Wu. Gain-Framed Messages Do Not Motivate Sun
Protection: A Meta-Analytic Review of Randomized Trials Comparing Gain-
Framed and Loss-Framed Appeals for Promoting Skin Cancer Prevention.
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 9, no. 6 (2012):
2121–2133.

