Page 83 - The Handbook of Persuasion and Social Marketing
P. 83

76                            The Handbook of Persuasion and Social Marketing

              However, priming may be understood not only as media effect but also
            as a political campaign strategy—candidate priming. According to Negrine
            (1994), the key elements of the political communication process include
            media content, the influence of political institutions and other political
            and social actors on the context of the messages, the specific audience and
            interaction processes between sources of information, and the media dif-
            fusing information. The content of media messages is the result of the
            work of media practitioners (e.g., owners of media corporations, editors,
            journalists, reporters) and political actors or events covered by the media.
            Groups that influence the content of political communication have differ-
            ent levels of power in this area. In their interactions with the media, politi-
            cal  actors—including  parties,  certain  politicians,  the  government,  and
            others—try to achieve their own goals, and sometimes they manage to do
            so by dominating the content of the message (Sheafer and Weimann,
            2005).
              However, if they fail, the “independent” communication of the media
            may have a negative influence on the level of candidate support. This has
            been seen, for example, with respect to economic recession and incum-
            bents in American presidential elections (Shah, Watts, Domke, Fan, &
            Fibison, 1999); the Iraq war and the 2005 British general election (Stevens
            et al., 2011; Stevens & Karp, 2012); and public approval of the president’s
            or government’s job, as in the Iran-Contra disclosure and evaluations of
            President Ronald Reagan (Krosnick & Kinder, 1990), crime news and sup-
            port for President Bill Clinton (Valentino, 1999), and the invasion of Iraq
            and evaluations of President George W. Bush (McAllister, 2006).
              Based on both quantitative and historical analysis of John F. Kennedy’s
            1960 presidential campaign, Jacobs and Shapiro (1994) report that the
            candidate’s policy positions were related to the results of his privately com-
            missioned public opinion polls. Kennedy deliberately used these popular
            issues to attract media attention and to shape the electorate’s standards for
            evaluating his personal attributes.
              Candidates intentionally engage in priming by emphasizing certain is-
            sues (candidate agenda building)—by giving those issues more space in
            their statements—with the goal of inducing voters to put more weight on
            those issues when choosing among candidates (Druckman, Jacobs, &
            Ostermeier, 2004). In relation to the definition of the scope of issues dis-
            cussed during the campaign, two opposing theories are recognized: the
            thousand-flower theory and the single-issue theory (Kern, 1989). The
            former suggests that in their electoral strategy, candidates should express
            their stance on all or the majority of issues that emerge in a given political
            atmosphere and are broadly discussed in the media. By contrast, the
   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88