Page 80 - The Handbook of Persuasion and Social Marketing
P. 80

Persuasion in the Political Context                                 73

               contained in that node is recalled. Thus, the strength of association be-
               tween the activated node and all linked nodes determines the extent of
               spreading activation and the particular information that can be retrieved
               from memory. Consequently, priming induced by a given stimulus (e.g.,
               information about an economic crisis) would occur mostly for attitudes
               that are directly relevant to that stimulus (e.g., the need for budget cuts).
               However, according to the spreading activation principle, linked consid-
               erations (e.g., health care system reform) may also be activated in this way.
               Thus, as Miller and Krosnick (1996, p. 82) suggest, “There might be a
               gradient of priming effects, decreasing in strength as attitudes become
               more and more remote from those being directly activated by a story.” It
               may happen because priming is likely to be “hydraulic” in nature: an in-
               crease in the impact of some issues should be accompanied by a decrease
               in the impact of other, unrelated issues.
                  The basic assumption of priming effects in politics is that the attention
               capacities of both the general public and politicians (candidates or govern-
               ment) are constrained, often quite severely. The public holds many gener-
               alized positions on issues, but only a few of those issues are relevant at any
               particular time. That is, people will attend to only a limited number of is-
               sues (Jones & Baumgartner, 2004; Zaller, 1992).


               Media and Candidate Priming
               As defined in the political communication literature, priming refers to
               “changes in the standards that people use to make political evaluations”
               (Iyengar & Kinder, 1987, p. 63). Priming is analyzed mainly as a media
               effect. Gamson, Croteau, Hoynes, and Sasson (1992) stated that a wide
               variety of media messages act as teachers of values, ideologies, and beliefs,
               providing images for interpreting the world whether or not the designers
               are conscious of this intent. Then media presentation of political issues, by
               selecting and emphasizing certain values while excluding others (media
               agenda building), is likely to influence which cognitions are activated as
               voters  evaluate a  political  environment  (Domke, Shah,  & Wackman,
               1998). Media priming occurs when news content, crime dramas (Holbrook
               & Hill, 2005), or late-night comedy shows (Young, 2012) suggest to news
               audiences that they ought to use specific issues as benchmarks for evaluat-
               ing the performance of leaders and governments. For example, messages
               communicated through and by the media during an election significantly
               influence which attitudes and information are likely to be retrieved or ac-
               cessed from memory and incorporated into voters’ judgments and ulti-
               mate choices of candidates.
   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85