Page 105 - The Language of Humour
P. 105

92 SPOKEN HUMOUR—TELEVISION AND RADIO
               share  in the  humour, as there’s  no  intention to make the talk
               inclusive for a wider group.
             2. Yet this is a fictional and scripted scenario, so there is a need for an
               audience to share the humour. The most obvious target audience
               are those  that can identify with the group of young, attractive,
               single New Yorkers, either because they share, or aspire to, those
               characteristics. The audience figures probably bear this out. There
               is vicarious pleasure in their successful life-style, marred only by
               minor setbacks. This description, however, suggests little more than
               the bland world of soap-powder adverts. The six protagonists are
               not simply glamorous, but have distinct character quirks.
             3. Here are a range of comments made by students about each of the
               characters:  Rachel: sexy, funky, dotty. Monica: obsessive,
               competitive, obsessive about weight. Phoebe: weird, new-agey, on
               another planet, unpredictable. Chandler:  witty, cynical, insecure.
               Joey: over-confident, a lad, dopey.  Ross: sensitive,  odd, geeky,
               introspective. The sitcom thus features a range of personality types
               that occur in friendship groupings; they are good company, but can
               be infuriating.
             4. The situation from week to week explores all sorts of combinations
               of characters and the  comic potential of the clashes:  Joey and
               Chandler as flat-mates and rivals: Rachel and Ross with their on-
               off love affair; Ross and Monica with brother/sister tensions;
               Phoebe out on a limb.
             5. It would be interesting to test out written  versions of the comic
               dialogue, without the speakers’ names, to see how easily utterances
               could be matched up to the characters. Where the interchange leads
               up to a punchline, the ‘feeder’ lines could, perhaps, be spoken by
               any character, but the part which gains a laugh is often associated
               with a particular  personality. Phoebe’s comic lines, for example,
               could only be  delivered by  her. The humour  is  based  on the
               oddness of her responses. The world she inhabits is one of high-
               minded aspirations, unaware of the need for a lighter, more trivial
               response  in that situation:  when asked what she wants for her
               birthday, she  launches into deeply-felt wishes about  her  mother.
               She often interprets other people’s questions and  comments
               literally, ignoring the conventional force of the utterance: ‘Guess
               who we saw today?’ is a conversational opener that does not invite
               a protracted guessing game. Ross’s observations tend to delve so
               deeply into the implications of notions, for example ‘if seven dog
               years equals one human year…’hat he loses the others—but not the
   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110