Page 20 - Cultural Studies Dictionary
P. 20

INTRODUCTION



           for example, universities and publishing houses. Consequently, as it has become
           something to be taught, so cultural studies has acquired a multitude of institutional
           bases, courses, textbooks and students. In due course, this process leads to a certain
           ‘disciplining’ of cultural studies. The courses now offered by universities for  xix
           undergraduate students constitute a broad ‘definition’ of the parameters of cultural
           studies. The textbooks that follow, including my own (Barker, 2000), reinforce this
           process. Many cultural studies practitioners have felt ill at ease with the forging of
           institutional disciplinary boundaries for the field. Professionalized and institutionalized
           cultural studies might, feared Hall, ‘formalize out of existence the critical questions of
           power, history and politics, (Hall, 1992: 286).
             However, although higher education is a branch of government and thus teachers are
           an arm of the state, higher education remains, at least within liberal democracies, a
           privileged site of critical inquiry. Writers, researchers and teachers in higher education
           may not be the ‘organic’ intellectuals that the ‘pioneers’ of cultural studies hoped for.
           However, they are in a position to speak with, and provide intellectual resources for,
           New Social Movements, workers in cultural industries and those involved with the
           forging of  cultural policy. To some extent, cultural studies is constrained by its
           institutionalization, yet, it retains a critical edge. Likewise, while cultural studies is to a
           degree an academic discipline of the university system, it nevertheless continues to slip
           away from its moorings and slide across the surface of culture, its infinite object of
           inquiry and desire.
             In sum, cultural studies can be understood as an intellectual enterprise that is
           constituted by a set of overlapping language-games. Nevertheless, for those readers
           frustrated by my evasion in refusing to define cultural studies, I shall now make the
           claim that an exploration of the contemporary vocabulary of cultural studies suggests
           that we might understand it thus:

             Cultural studies is concerned with an exploration of culture, as constituted by the
             meanings and representations generated by human signifying practices, and the
             context in which they occur. Cultural studies has a particular interest in the
             relations of power and the political consequences that are inherent in such
             cultural practices. The prime purposes of cultural studies, which is located in the
             institutions of universities, publishing houses and bookshops, are the processes of
             intellectual clarification that could provide useful tools for cultural/political
             activists and policy makers.

           Of course, the tools of cultural studies are words and concepts – hence, in my view, the
           significance of a dictionary.


                                  FEATURES OF THE DICTIONARY

           This dictionary follows the format of most others, in that there is an alphabetical list of
           concepts that can be consulted whereupon one will find a discussion of the meanings
           and uses associated with that concept in the context of cultural studies. However, I have
   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25