Page 371 - The Toyota Way Fieldbook
P. 371

Chapter 15. Complete a Thorough Root Cause Analysis             345


        therefore, they have a “high tendency” of occurrence. The cumulative effect of
        these small losses can be very great. In addition, the reduction will generate an
        immediate and continuous payback.  A small payback that can be captured
        immediately and will continue to pay forever is a preferred result. Small cycle
        time losses are also generally easy to correct. They may include excessive oper-
        ator or machine motion, delays due to waiting, or overprocessing (doing more
        than necessary). Of course, these are all forms of muda (waste), and the removal
        of muda is a primary objective.
            Visiting the workplace, you will probably see many other examples of cycle
        losses and process stoppages. You’ll need to gather facts to understand the total
        impact of each issue—the importance, urgency, and tendency—and a simple way
                                                          1
        to do this is to use a value-added/non-value-added breakdown list as shown in
        Figure 15-3. The example is from a sawing operation, but the list generated is fair-
        ly typical in most manufacturing operations. Remember, the links of the causal
        chain were related to losses of time, either through cycle losses or due to losses of
        time when the operation is not running or not adding value. The list that is gener-
        ated will include both cycle and run-time losses. Since the ultimate objective is to
        find causes that are linked through the causal chain to the original problem, we’re
        looking only for those activities that take time away from the value-adding task.
        In other words, if the operator is performing a non-value-adding task but the
        machine is adding value while the operator does the task, improving this item will
        not lead to reducing the problem, and thus is not a beneficial improvement. The
        first priority is to address the issues that directly reduce the time available to add
        value and therefore cause a loss of production.




            Value-Added Task Non-Value-Added Task
                                 Load  saw
         Blade is cutting wood   Unload saw
                                 Change blade                ALL ACTIVITY
                                 Clean up                     OTHER THAN
                                                           CUTTING WOOD IS
                                 Break down
                                 Inspect parts                NON-VALUE-
                                 Move finished parts        ADDED ACTIVITY
                                 Meetings
                                 Waiting for wood
                                 Handling wood



        Figure 15-3. Value-added/Non-value-added analysis

        For further information on the case see:  Bill Costantino, "Cedar Works:  Making the Transition to
        Lean," in J.K. Liker (ed.), Becoming Lean, Productivity Press, 1997.
   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376