Page 423 - The Toyota Way Fieldbook
P. 423

396                       THE TOYOTA WAY FIELDBOOK


                 clearing the floor of the current process, painting the floor, then moving
                 equipment back in the new layout.
              ◆ Thursday: Evaluate process (Check), improve (Act), and keep going
                 through Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) until you have a good approach.
              ◆ Friday: Develop a presentation for management. Present to manage-
                 ment. Celebrate. (Often the event ends after a lunch celebration.)
           3. Follow-up to the workshop.  There are always items that could not be done
              during the week, which are put together as a homework list sometimes
              called a “kaizen newsletter.” An action plan for what, who, and when is
              prepared during the one-week workshop, and follow-up is needed to be
              sure the items get done.
            The kaizen workshop approach has gotten a bad name in many quarters. Jim
        Womack used to laughingly refer to it as “kamikaze kaizen,” or “drive-by kaizen.”
        The implication was that you swoop down fast and furiously, solve some prob-
        lems, and swoop back up, or drive by, take aim and fire, and you’re done. The
        problem is not that kaizen workshops are inherently bad, but that many com-
        panies turned their entire lean process into a series of kaizen workshops along
        with a kaizen promotion office to administer, support, and monitor kaizen
        events. They may even count kaizen events as a key performance metric. There
        are some serious weaknesses in this approach (see Figure 19-1):
           1. Kaizen workshops generally are point kaizen focusing on the individual
              process. Since there is no broader vision, this will not lead to flow across
              the enterprise.
           2. The kaizen workshop generally ends with a homework list of to-do items,
              which often do not get done since there is no serious ownership of the
              process by the people in the work area.
           3. While people in the work area are involved in the event and get very excited
              and enthusiastic during the workshop, reality sets in the week after and
              more often than not there is backsliding toward the pre-workshop state.
           4. There is a tendency to judge kaizen events based only on short-term cost
              savings, which does not drive true systems change.
           5. There is no lasting cultural change.
            This is not to say that good companies serious about lean should ignore the
        kaizen event as a tool. There are some remarkable strengths of the kaizen event,
        including:
           1. This is an exciting experience for all involved. The concentrated analysis
              and improvement, combined with the feeling of being part of a team, can
              literally change people’s worldview. They can see waste and also see
              what is possible when waste is removed.
   418   419   420   421   422   423   424   425   426   427   428