Page 11 - The engineering of chemical reactions
P. 11

PREFACE






















                            learned about chemical reactors at the knees of Rutherford Aris and Neal Amundson,
                            when, as a surface chemist, I taught recitation sections and then lectures in the Reac-
                         I tion Engineering undergraduate course at Minnesota. The text was Aris’  Elementary
                         Chemical Reaction Analysis,  a book that was obviously elegant but at first did not seem
                         at all elementary. It described porous pellet diffusion effects in chemical reactors and the
                         intricacies of nonisothermal reactors in a very logical way, but to many students it seemed to
                         be an exercise in applied mathematics with dimensionless variables rather than a description
                         of chemical reactors.
                              We later used Octave Levenspiel’s book  Chemical Reaction Engineering,  which was
                         written with a delightful style and had many interesting figures and problems that made
                         teaching from it easy. Levenspiel had chapters on reactions of solids and on complex
                         reactors such as fluidized beds, topics to which all chemical engineering students should
                         be introduced. However, the book had a notation in which all problems were worked in
                         terms of the molar feed rate of one reactant F~~ and the fractional conversion of this
                         reactant X. The “fundamental equations” for the PFTR and CSTR given by Levenspiel
                         were V  = FAN   1 dX/rA (X)  and V  = FA,Xf  r-A(X),   respectively. Since the energy balance
                         is conventionally written in terms of spatial variations of properties (as is the general
                         species balance), there was no logical way to solve mass and energy balance equations
                         simultaneously, as we must do to consider nonisothermal and  nonideal  reactors. This
                         notation also prohibits the correct handling of multiple reaction systems because there is
                         no obvious X or  r,J  with multiple reactions, and Levenspiel could only describe selectivity
                         and yield qualitatively. In that notation, reactors other than the perfect plug flow and the
                         perfectly stirred reactor could not be handled because it did not allow consideration of
                         properties versus position in the reactor. However, Levenspiel’s books describe complex
                         multiphase reactors much more thoroughly and readably than any of its successors, certainly
                         more than will be attempted here.
                                                                                              xi
   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16