Page 112 - The engineering of chemical reactions
P. 112

96    Single Reactions in Continuous Isothermal Reactors

                          From the previous equation we have
                                     CAo
                    _I1
                    :,u          t=     $$=i(&-$--)=&(A-;)=9min
                    -,
                                     s
                                     CA
                          so that
                                                 V  = 4 x 9 = 36 liters



                       Comparison with batch reactor

                       We could proceed as before to write out the expressions for the irreversible reaction
                                              A  +  products,  r=kC;
                       for different values of n,  but in fact we have already worked these problems in the previous
                       chapter.
                            In a PFTR the time t that a molecule has spent in the reactor is z/u, and the time for
                       the molecule to leave the reactor is L/u,  which is the total time that a molecule has spent
                       in the reactor,

                                                     TPFTR  =  lb&h
                       Therefore, to find the behavior of a PFTR for kinetics that we have solved in a batch reactor,
                       all we have to do is make the transformation tt,&,  -z+  rPi7rn.  The solution for the rtth-order
                       irreversible reaction from Chapter 2 is

                                          1CA  =  C&l  +  (n  -  l)kC;,‘t]l’(‘-n)   1


                       (except for 12 =  l),  where all we did was replace t for the batch reactor by r  for the PFTR.
                            We can write for the residence time in a constant-density, constant-cross-section PFTR

                                                  tpflR  = v/v  = L/u
                       because, for constant reactor cross section At,  we have V  =  AtL  and v = uAt.
                            The PFTR was in fact assumed to be in a steady state  in which no parameters vary
                       with time (but they obviously vary with position), whereas the batch reactor is assumed
                       to be spatially uniform and vary only with time. In the argument we switched to a moving
                       coordinate system in which we traveled down the reactor with the fluid velocity  u,  and in
                       that case we follow the change in reactant molecules undergoing reaction as they move
                       down the tube. This is identical to the situation in a batch reactor!
                            We can show this more formally by writing  dt  -+  dz/u,
                                                dCA      dCA
                                                -  -+  u  - =  -r(C,)
                                                 dt       dz
                       which shows that the performance of batch reactor and PFTR  are identical, with the reaction
                       time  t  in a batch reactor corresponding to the residence time r  in a PFTR. Again, we note
                       that a PFTR  “acts like” a batch reactor, while a CSTR “looks like” a batch reactor.
   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117