Page 259 - Thermal Hydraulics Aspects of Liquid Metal Cooled Nuclear Reactors
P. 259

230                   Thermal Hydraulics Aspects of Liquid Metal Cooled Nuclear Reactors

         “statistical steady state,” meaning that long-term statistics are independent of time.
         The assessment of such a condition is all but trivial. In principle, every flow
         parameter—velocity, pressure, or temperature at a given point, average value in a
         given line, on a selected surface or in a selected volume—should exhibit constant
         mean values with fluctuations around the means. In the turbulent channel flow, typical
         parameters used to identify statistical steady state are usually global variables, such as
         mean velocity, mean temperature, turbulence kinetic energy, friction velocities and
         friction temperatures computed at the walls, etc. Typically, statistical independence
         must be observed over several tenths of flow-through times and several thousands
         of viscous time units in order to recognize the statistical steady state in a running
         DNS. These runs in most cases require several 10–100 thousands of time steps.
            Once the statistical steady state is recognized, the spatial and temporal averaging of
         the results can start. Typical averaging procedures include computations of mean
         values in a point, over the line, surface, or in the selected volume. Flow statistics
         can be computed upon runtime or a posteriori by using snapshots of the field variables.
         Both approaches have obvious advantages and drawbacks. Because the number of sta-
         tistical quantities to be computed can reach an order of a hundred parameters (when
         various budget terms must be evaluated), the choice of the postprocessing approach is
         influenced by the available computational and storage resources.
            Instantaneous fields can offer certain information; however, statistical averaging is
         necessary to compare results with experiments or other simulations. It is shown in the
         channel flow section, which is a geometry with two homogeneous directions, that the
         number of the time steps needed for the acceptable statistical uncertainty is rather large.
         Thecorrespondingnumberof time steps fortheflowswitha singlehomogeneous direc-
         tion is larger, and must be even larger in the geometries without homogeneous direc-
         tions, where the only available type of averaging is averaging in time or ensemble
         averaging with independent DNS runs performed in the same geometry. The paper
         of Oliver et al. (2014) offers a methodology and a tool for analyses of uncertainties
         in DNS simulations. Their tool, which has been recently used in the work by Flageul
         and Tiselj (2017) to analyze statistical uncertainty in channel flow heat transfer, is rec-
         ommended for quantification of the statistical uncertainties in the DNS studies.


         6.1.1.4   Results: Channel flow


         Overview of the turbulent heat transfer simulations performed in channel geometry at
         low Prandtl number is collected in Tables 6.1.1.1 and 6.1.1.2. The fourth column of
         Table 6.1.1.1 specifies thermal BCs used in the simulations: simulations denoted by
         F and NF were performed only with the two limiting thermal BCs: fluctuating and
         nonfluctuating temperature BC. Simulations denoted by C were conjugate heat trans-
         fer simulations. Simulations of Tiselj and Cizelj (2012) and Tiselj (2014) were per-
         formed at very low Prandtl numbers as benchmarks for the codes that will be used
         for heat transfer analyses in liquid sodium fast reactors. The latest publication by
         Oder et al. (2015) summarizes results of channel flow conjugate heat transfer simu-
         lations using the spectral element code Nek5000.
   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264