Page 180 - Bird R.B. Transport phenomena
P. 180

164  Chapter 5  Velocity  Distributions in Turbulent Flow
      The  Modified van Driest  Equation

                           There  have  been  numerous  attempts to devise  empirical  expressions  that  can  describe
                           the  turbulent  shear  stress  all the way from  the wall to the main  turbulent  stream. Here
                                                                         7
                           we  give a modification  of the equation  of van  Driest.  This is a formula  for the  mixing
                           length of Eq. 5.4-4:
                                                              — exp(—\
                                                   I = 0.4y                                     (5.4-7)
                                                          Vl  - exp(-026yvJv)
                           This  relation has  been  found  to be useful  for predicting  heat and  mass  transfer  rates in
                           flow in tubes.
                               In the next  two  sections  and in several  problems at the end of the chapter, we illus-
                           trate  the use of the  above  empiricisms.  Keep  in mind  that  these  expressions  for  the
                           Reynolds  stresses  are little more than crutches that can be used  for the representation of
                           experimental data or for solving problems  that fall into rather special  classes.


       EXAMPLE   5.4-1     Obtain an expression  for  т { ух  = pv v  as a function  of у in the neighborhood of the wall.
                                                      x y
      Development  of the  SOLUTION
      Reynolds  Stress
      Expression in the    (a)  We  start by  making a Taylor  series  development of the three components of v':
      Vicinity of the  Wall
                                                                                                 (5.4-8)
                                                              y = 0  2!



                                                               J  +  2! sf                       (5.4-9)
                                                              y
                                                           dv.
                                               v' (y)  = v'     У +  2?-    ir +                (5.4-10)
                                                z
                                                              y = 0  ^*
                           The  first  term in Eqs. 5.4-8 and  10 must be zero because of the no-slip condition; the first term
                           in  Eq. 5.4-9 is zero in the absence of mass  transfer.  Next we  can write  Eq. 5.2-11 at у =  0,
                                                            dv[    Sv'
                                                                      z   = 0                   (5.4-11)
                                                     dx  y=0    ./ = 0
                           The  first  and third terms in this equation are zero because  of the no-slip condition. Therefore
                            we  have to conclude that the second  term is zero as well.  Hence all the dashed-underlined
                            terms in Eqs. 5.4-8  to 10 are zero, and we  may conclude that

                                                     rf  = v' v'  = Ay  + By 4                  (5.4-12)
                                                                  3
                                                      x   P  x  y
                            This  suggests—but  does  not prove —that  the  lead  term in the  Reynolds  stress  near a wall
                                                        8
                                                                                                 9
                                                 3
                            should be proportional to y . Extensive  studies of mass transfer  rates in closed channels  have,
                            however,  established  that А Ф 0.
                               7
                                E. R. van Driest, /. Aero. Sci., 23,1007-1011 and 1036 (1956). Van Driest's original equation did
                            not have the square root divisor. This modification was made by O. T. Hanna, О. С Sandall, and
                            P. R. Mazet, AIChE Journal, 27, 693-697 (1981) so that the turbulent viscosity would be proportional to y 3
                            as у —> 0, in accordance with  Eq. 5.4-2.
                               8
                                H. Reichardt, Zeits. f. angew. Math. u. Mech., 31, 208-219 (1951). See also J. O. Hinze, Turbulence,
                            McGraw-Hill, New York, 2nd edition (1975), pp. 620-621.
                               9
                                R. H. Notter and C. A. Sleicher, Chem. Eng. Sci., 26,161-171 (1971); О. С Sandall and О. Т. Hanna,
                            AIChE Journal, 25,190-192 (1979); D. W. Hubbard and E. N. Lightfoot, Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundamentals, 5,
                            370-379 (1966).
   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185