Page 486 - Tunable Lasers Handbook
P. 486

446      Stephen Vincent Benson


                                   1




                               U
                               -
                               w
                               .-  o
                               m
                               E
                               z"  -0.5
                                  -1
                                   -16.0            0.00            16.0
                                             Wavelength  detuning
                  FIGURE 3   The normalized gain function versus the normalized wavelength detuning defined by
                  v  = 2~chV,$,,/k  is shown. The wavelength  detuning  is defined  with respect  to the  resonant  wave-
                  length. At  the resonant  wavelength  there  is  no  gain. At  longer wavelengths  there  is  gain.  and  at
                  shorter Lvavelengths there is loss. 4 uniform wiggler was assumed for this curve.




                  operating in the Compton regime. Because the space charge interaction varies in
                  strength as y', lasers using highly relativistic electron beams are all Compton
                  regime lasers. Note that the converse is not true: that is, a low-energy FEL is not
                  necessarily a Raman device. In order for the gain to be enhanced by the space
                  charge wave, the wiggler field must have a longitudinal component. This is not
                  true in many low-energy Compton regime devices. Only Compton regime lasers
                  are used in user facilities to date so I will confine my discussion to them.
                      Because the parameter y is generally quite large compared to unity, the reso-
                  nant wavelength can be much smaller than the wiggler wavelength. By varying
                  the  electron-beam  energy,  a  single  wiggler can  support a  very  large range  of
                  wavelengths. As a result, FELs have operated in the Compton regime at wave-
                  lengths from 8 mm to 240 nm. An individual laser does not operate over such a
                  large  range,  but  FELs  operating  in  three  different  wavelength  ranges  have
                  demonstrated a tuning range greater than 8 to 1 in a single laser.
                      Other authors have given very complete descriptions of the theory of FELs. I
                   will therefore not spend much space in this chapter on the details of free-electron
                  theory. Interested readers are urged to consult Brau's  excellent textbook  [6] or
                   Volume 4 of the Laser Handbook  [7]. This chapter discusses the characteristics
                   of FELs without going into much detail about how they arise and will shdy vari-
                   ous means by which one may cover a broad wavelength range with a FEL. I then
                   discuss some of the issues involved in achieving a large tuning range. FELs are
                   large and expensive devices. They are therefore usually used in a user facility set-
                   ting rather than an individual's lab. I will describe some of  the broadly tunable
                   lasers available at various user facilities around the  world.  Other free-electron
   481   482   483   484   485   486   487   488   489   490   491