Page 85 - Urban water supply handbook
P. 85

IMPROVING URBAN WATER INFRASTRUCTURE THROUGH PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS


             3.4               HISTORY, PLANNING, OUTSOURCING

               Prior to 1997, contracts for water and wastewater O&M were limited to 5 years
             and required a termination clause allowing cancellation after 3 years. With such a
             narrow time frame, operators were restricted in their ability to secure new capital
             improvements and increase operating efficiencies. Short-term contracts were
             designed to keep vendors honest—rebidding contracts every 3 or 5 years kept con-
             tinuous competitive pressures on vendors to reduce costs and improve operations.


             3.2 LONG-TERM CONTRACTS


             The market for water and wastewater public-private partnerships was transformed
             in 1997 when the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issued new regulations that
             made possible long-term contracts for public utility operations while maintaining
             the tax-exempt status of bonds used to finance the facility. Under Revenue
             Procedure 97-13, private operators can enter into contracts for at least 15 years and
             up to 20 years for public utility properties, which include water and wastewater
             treatment systems.
               The new IRS rules also imposed constraints on long-term contracts that are
             designed to prevent the abuse of tax-exempt financing. Contractors can have no
             interest in the net revenues of the system but may share in cost savings or revenue
             enhancements. These measures have led to a wave of recent contracts with gain
             sharing provisions that provide incentives for private operators to achieve addi-
             tional cost savings.
               Another incentive-based provision of the rule changes allows private operators
             to have 20 percent of the total contract amount to be in the form of a variable pay-
             ment from cost savings or revenue sharing. These provisions create a win-win out-
             come for private operators and municipalities—contractors continually search for
             further operating efficiencies and cities benefit from additional cost savings.
               The net effect of the changes in IRS rules has been to give the private sector
             more flexibility to meet local water and wastewater needs. Public-private partner-
             ships can now run the gamut from a short-term O&M contract to a long-term con-
             tract that includes design, build, and operate (DBO) features, all without private
             ownership (Table 3.1). Long-term contracts have proven to be an effective method
             for addressing municipal water and wastewater needs, especially for capital
             improvements or in cases where new facilities are required.


             3.3 EXTENT OF PRIVATIZATION


             While the current extent of privatization of water and wastewater facilities is
             somewhat limited, recent trends suggest that more cities will be examining private
             sector alternatives in the future.




         Downloaded from Digital Engineering Library @ McGraw-Hill (www.digitalengineeringlibrary.com)
                    Copyright © 2004 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved.
                      Any use is subject to the Terms of Use as given at the website.
   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90