Page 101 - Valve Selection Handbook
P. 101

88                   Valve Selection  Handbook

            the upstream and downstream seatings  into still  closer  contact  and cause
            the pressure in the valve body cavity to rise. A similar situation may arise
             with soft-seated wedge gate valves in which the wedge is capable of pro-
            ducing  an  upstream  seat  seal.  Thus,  if  such  valves  handle  a  liquid  with
            high  thermal  expansion,  or  if  revaporation  of  trapped  condensate  can
            occur, they may have to be provided  with  a pressure-equalizing  connec-
            tion as described  for parallel  gate valves on page 77.
            Case Stud/ of Wedge Gate Valve Failure


               Figure  3-46 through Figure  3-48  show components of a DN 300 (NFS
             12) class  150 wedge  gate  valve to  API  standard  600  that  failed  on  first
            application.
               The valve was mounted in a horizontal line under an angle of 45°  from
            the  vertical  for  ease  when hand-operating  a  gear  drive.  This  operating
            position  required  the  wedge  to  ride  on  the  body  rib.  Unfortunately,  the
            guide  slot  in  the  wedge  had  sharp  edges.  As  the  wedge  traveled  on  the
            rib,  the  sharp  edges  of  the  guide  slot  caught  on  the  rough  rib  surface,
            causing the wedge to rotate until contacting the opposite  body rib. At this
            stage,  the wedge was jammed.  Further  closing  effort  by the valve  opera-
            tor  produced  the  damage  to  the  valve  internals  shown in  Figure  3-46
            through Figure  3-48.
               Figure  3-46  shows  the damage  to the wedge  guide  that  was riding on
            the  body  rib  and Figure  3-47  shows  the  damaged  body  rib.  Figure  3-48
            shows  the  bent  valve  stem  and  damage  to  the  stem  surface around  the
            stem guide bush.
              Further  inspection  of  the  valve  showed  also  that play  in  the  wedge
            guides  was  larger  than  the  possible  travel  of  the  wedge  on  the  stem.
            Thus,  the  stem  had  to  carry  the  wedge  for  part  of  its  travel  in  a  tilted
            position.  Furthermore,  the lengths of body rib and  wedge guide were far
            too short to adequately support the wedge during all stages of travel.
              This  valve failure  was not isolated  but was typical for  a high percent-
            age of  all  installed  wedge  gate  valves.  Finally,  all  suspect  valves  had  to
            be replaced  prior to start-up of the plant.

            Standards Pertaining to Wedge Gate Valves

              Appendix C provides  a list of U.S. and British  standards pertaining to
            wedge gate valves.
   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106