Page 213 - Valve Selection Handbook
P. 213

200                  Valve  Selection Handbook

               Keeping  the pressure  loss  below  3% becomes  progressively  more dif-
            ficult  as the value of the  area ratio  of valve entry to valve nozzle A E/A N
            decreases. 47  For  a  ratio  of  0.9 A E/KA N  =  4  for  a  full  lift  liquid  relief
            valve,  for  example,  the  value of  the  permissible  resistance  coefficient  is
            only  about  0.5  (see  sizing  diagram  Figure  7-8  on  page  271).  This  is
            already  the resistance  coefficient  of a sharp-edged  pipe inlet. In this par-
            ticular case,  either a larger  inlet pipe should be considered  or, where this
            is  not  possible,  a  liquid  relief  valve  with oscillation  damper.  Consult
            manufacturer in the latter  case.

            Instability due  to valve oversizing. If a pop action  pressure relief valve
            is  grossly  oversized,  the  discharging  fluid  may  not  be  able  to  hold  the
            valve in the  open  position.  The valve will then reopen  and close in  suc-
            cession. According to  one  manufacturer's catalog, 48  this  may  happen if
            the rate of flow is less than approximately 25% of the valve capacity.
               The  frequency of  valve  opening  and  closing  for  a  given  mass  flow
            depends  on  the  volume of  the  system  and  the  valve blowdown setting.
            Instability can be overcome entirely by limiting the valve lift  in consulta-
            tion with the valve manufacturer.

            Verification of Operating Data of Spring-Loaded Pressure
            Relief Valves Prior to and after  Installation

              Verification  of operating data of pressure relief  valves prior to installa-
            tion  consists  commonly of  a  set  pressure  test  only. The  test  is normally
            carried  out  on  a  test  bench  as  instructed  by  the  valve manufacturer.
            Under  bench  conditions,  the  set pressure  point  can  readily  be  registered
            by observing first steady flow or  lift.
              However, only verification testing in situ can register  the plant specific
            influences  on  set pressure  and operation  of  the  valve. But  because plant
            noise  interferes with  the  audible detection  of  the  set  pressure,  the  pop-
            ping  pressure  is  commonly  taken  as  the  set  pressure.  This  assessment
            method  is  of  little  consequence  for  high  pressure  valves  in  which  the
            opening pressure difference amounts often  to not more than  1% to 2% of
            the  set pressure.  In  low  pressure  valves,  however,  the  popping  pressure
            may be higher than the actual set pressure by as much as 5%. This devia-
            tion must be taken into account when correlating the thus determined  set
            pressure to the normal operating pressure, the reseating pressure, and the
            assessment  of  the  achieved  blowdown. Thus,  if  in  addition,  the  opera-
   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218