Page 180 - Vogel's TEXTBOOK OF QUANTITATIVE CHEMICAL ANALYSIS
P. 180

where  V represents the appropriate variance.  The separate evaluation of  both
       Vs (the sampling variance) and VA (the analytical variance) may be achieved by
       using the analysis of variance procedure (See Section 4.18). A comparison can
       be made of the between-sample variance - an estimate of the sampling error -
       and the within-sample variance - an estimate of the analytical error.
       Example  1.  If  the  sampling  error is  +3 per cent  and  the  analytical  error is
       + 1 per cent, from equation ( 1 ) we can see that the total error s,  is given by

       s,  =         = k3.16 per cent
         If,  in  the above example, the  analytical  error  was  k0.2 per  cent  then  the
       total error s,  would  be  equal to  k3.006 per  cent. Hence  the contribution  of
       the  analytical  error  to  the  total  error  is  virtually  insignificant.  Youden7
       has stated that once the  analytical  uncertainty  is reduced  to one-third of  the
       sampling uncertainty, further reduction of the former is not necessary. It is most
       important to realise that if  the sampling error is large, then a rapid analytical
       method with relatively low precision  may suffice.
         In designing a sampling plan  the following points should be considered:'
       (a) the number of samples to be taken;
       (b)  the size of the sample;
       (c)  should  individual  samples  be  analysed  or  should  a  sample composed  of
          two or more increments (composite) be prepared.
         If  the  composition  of  the  bulk  material  to  be  sampled  is  unknown,  it  is
       sensible practice to perform a preliminary investigation by collecting a number
       of  samples and determining the analyte of interest.
         The confidence limits (see Section 4.11) are given by  the relationship




       where  s,  is the standard deviation  of  individual samples, X is the mean of  the
       analytical results and serves as an estimate  of  the  true mean  p, and  n is  the
       number of  samples taken.

       Example 2.  An estimate of the variability of nickel in a consignment of an ore,
       based  on  16 determinations, was  found  to  be  + 1.5%. How  many  samples
       should  be  taken to give (at the 95 per cent confidence level) a sampling error
       of less than 0.5  per cent nickel?
         The  value  0.5 percent  is  in  fact  the  difference between  the  sample  mean
       X and  the actual value  p. If  this  value is represented  by  E, then equation (2)
       may be written as


       and, therefore,





          From the tables (Appendix 12) the value of t for (n - 1 ),  15 degrees of freedom
   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185