Page 32 - Welding Robots Technology, System Issues, and Applications
P. 32

Welding Robots
                           16
                           programming languages, object oriented  programming, remote interfaces using
                           RPC sockets  and TCP/IP sockets,  etc..  Figure 1.7 shows some of the robot
                           manipulators available currently on the market.

                           And how do we define robotics then? Is it a science? Is it a technique or collection
                           of techniques? If the reader takes a robotics book then something like this appears:
                              “A robot is a re-programmable multi-functional manipulator designed to
                              move  materials, parts, tools, or specialized devices, through variable
                              programmed motions for the performance of a variety of tasks”, from the
                              book Robotics – Control, Sensing, Vision and Intelligence, Fu, Gonzalez,
                              Lee, MacGraw Hill, 1987.

                           Although correct, despite being restricted to robot  manipulators, this  definition
                           does not give the correct idea. The common-sense image of a  robot is usually
                           associated with strong and superb machines, tireless (like  Karel’s Capek
                           machines), obedient (“yes, noberto san …”), but nevertheless, fascinating machines
                           that make us dream. And that fascination is not in that definition.

                           Like with everything, we should look to the past and pick what was fundamental
                           for the history of robotics in terms of ideas and  dreams. From the  Greeks and
                           Arabs we should pick the idea of “ingenious devices”.  In fact, robotics is very
                           much about mechanics, motion, mechanisms to transmit motion, and having the art
                           and the skill to design and build those mechanisms. Yes, “ingenious devices” is
                           really a good start.

                           Then we should listen to Leonardo (sixteenth century) and look to his quest on “…
                           precision …” and “…permanent power source …”. He understood that robots need
                           parts built with very high precision and a permanent power source. That was not
                           available at his time, i.e., machine tools and a permanent power source (electric,
                           hydraulic or pneumatic).

                           Finally, we should read Nicola Tesla and observe his outstanding and visionary
                           work. He understood after all that robots are a consequence of dreams and neat
                           ideas. Robots need to be controlled and programmed, distinguish situations, etc.,
                           have ways of “understanding”, and that means computers, electronics, software,
                           and sensors, in a way to enable machines to be  programmed and to  sense their
                           environment. Those are the elements that enable us scientists, engineers, and robot
                           users, to try different things and new ideas, being a source of fascination. In his
                           own words [4]:

                              “… But this element I could easily embody in it by conveying to it my own
                              intelligence, my own understanding. So this invention was evolved, and so a
                              new art came into existence, for which the name “teleautomatics” has been
                              suggested, which means the art of controlling movements and operations of
                              distant automatons.
   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37