Page 109 - Well Logging and Formation Evaluation
P. 109

Advanced Log Interpretation Techniques      99

               Above each column, it is necessary to derive randomly generated values
            for r m , r f , m, n, and R w between allowable ranges.
               At this point it should be noted that applying a range to both m and R w
            is not really fair if they have been determined through a Pickett plot, since
            any error in one will probably be corrected by adjusting the other so that
            the points still go through the waterline. Hence I would apply a range to
            one of the two parameters only if no water sand had been available for
            calibration and R w has been chosen purely from produced water samples
            or regional correlation. At the bottom of each column, average the S wpor
            and then take the mean of all the runs and the standard deviation as before.
            The mean S w is given by (SWPOR)average/(POR)average and the uncer-
            tainty in  S w is given by the standard deviation of SWPOR divided by
            (POR)average.
               Finally one should have arrived at mean and standard deviations for
            net/gross, porosity, and saturation that fully take into account uncertain-
            ties in all the input parameters. If you are using a saturation/height rela-
            tionship instead of Archie, the same process can be applied, but choose
            allowable ranges for your a and b values instead of m, n, and R w. I do not
            believe it is necessary to take into account error in the poroperm rela-
            tionships, S wirr , or fluid densities, since these would be compensated for
            when making the log(J)-log(S wr ) plot. If, however, the saturation/height
            relationship is derived entirely from core, you could consider adding a
            term to accommodate the uncertainty in s.cos(q).
               The second stage of the process involves looking at the uncertainties in
            the mean values of these parameters for individual reservoir units over the
            entire field. At this stage it is probably useful to digress a bit and cover
            some elements of basic sampling theory. Imagine that one is trying to esti-
            mate the mean value of people’s IQ by randomly sampling n people from
            a parent population of N individuals. Say the parent population has a mean
            IQ of M with a standard deviation of SD. The best way to estimate M is
            to take the mean of the IQs measured on the sample of n people, denoted
            by M n . Statistical theory states that if the SD of the sample of n people is
                                                               –
            S n , the SD of the mean of the parent population is S n / ÷n.
               If the accuracy of each individual IQ measurement is  d, the overall
            uncertainty (one standard deviation) in the value of M is given by:

               uncertainty in M = ( ( S n ) 2  n + ).                  (5.8.2)
                                            2
                                          d
               Hence, if we are trying to determine mean and uncertainty in the mean
            of, say, the porosity in a reservoir unit over the entire field, this may be
   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114