Page 295 - Using the Enneagram System to Identify and Grow Your Leadership Strengths and Achieve Maximum Success
P. 295

Take Charge of Change  269




           for engineers—for example, by basing their salary increases
           and bonuses, in part, on their ability to collaborate with
           other groups.

           When Fours are fatigued, either by overwork or by personal
        issues, they tend to overpersonalize resistance to change. Unfor-
        tunately, when resistance to organizational change occurs, it is
        sometimes expressed as personal criticisms, unfair speculations
        about a leader’s motivations, and worse. Whether these accusa-
        tions are public or private—and the latter is often more painful
        than public criticism, as it is more insidious—they are especially
        hurtful to Fours, who often have few filters or defenses with which
        to protect themselves from such criticisms.
           The Four’s sensitivity can also limit his or her ability to take
        charge of change in another way: Four leaders can be especially
        sympathetic to employees with whom they have strong bonds,
        whom they perceive as having suffered, or with whom they iden-
        tify in some regard. If one of these employees is going to be
        adversely affected by the forthcoming change, Fours can feel
        deeply troubled, sometimes to the point of making special accom-
        modations for this other person; this mirrors how Fours them-
        selves would want to be treated. A Four can also feel distressed by
        having to choose between inflicting pain on an individual that he
        or she cares about and doing what is best for the organization.
           Libby’s personal sensitivity can be seen in the following example:


           When Libby first received the consultant’s feedback, she was
           reluctant to make any changes. However, after the consultant
           told Libby that the feedback on her overall leadership
           performance was excellent and that employees throughout
           the company respected her as an engineer and a leader, and
           also liked her as a person, Libby became emotional and told
           the consultant about a painful event that had occurred years
           earlier in another organization: during a 360º leadership feed-
           back session, Libby’s scores had been marginal, and she was
   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300