Page 117 - Whole Earth Geophysics An Introductory Textbook For Geologists And Geophysicists

AR Oe

99 J. Plomerové, the in and H. Moho-plochy v mérenf konference seismic- California, 75, v. seismic man- North of Geological American D. Swiss Ecologae of late Are, in study and F. of Cambridge S. W. off of Journal American 1965, 2. ridges: v.70, A. D. Cambridge: the of of the Paris: Paris, the by edited John of the States,

Bibliography and the lithosphere Carpathian-Pannonian Ibrmajer I. rozloZenf profilovych A 1985, Colburn, profile across the San Andreas, Sargent, west-central of America, The 1989, crust upper and Geology The by A. W. Bally and Colorado: North of Ansorge, J. Milnes, The 1980, review, Origin 1988, Carpathian the basin: A Royden H. L. Association Geologists, Memoir 45, pp. 279-292. 1995,

Selected BabuSka V. of modelling region, Tectonophysics, v.23, pp. 215-235. Naklédalovd, vysledki z technickych odpala, 8 celostatni geofyzika, Geofyzika Brno, pp. 44-55. R. H. faults, Society W. L. Braile, continental in Overview, edited Boulder, Decade A. Frey, M. Basel-Chiasso—A Pant6, G. of rocks Pannonian by edited American Geldart, P. _ed.), P Dehlinger, “Seismic northern Geophysica

Bielik, Alpine-Western Z. 1985, Plo’ne and Seismological and America, America, Mueller, and Geol. Helv., v.73, pp. 437-462. and volcanic The Tulsa: L. and (2nd Geophysical Union, Monograph Le structure model from P. L. Applied Cambridge University Press, 860 pp. Dercourt Geol., in and J. the Tectonophysics, v.20, pp. 203-213.

M. Gravity M., CSSR-sestavené D., Calaveras D., of the North Palmer, of Geology, v. 1, pp. 39-52. S. Hart, in: Evolution, E., University Press, 592 pp. Jr., 1968, and Steinhart, J. S., and T. J. Smith the X. data, Journal M., 1976, 1988, Alpine-Carpathian 1973, The Alps, deJong H., and
J, W. W. America—An L., Geotraverse G., M., C., J. Soc. in
R. 1994, Eastern Basin Herrmann, HSS a refraction Bulletin pp. 175-191. structure of R. Society Bernoulli, Salters, V., S. Cenozoic Hungary, Basin Horvath, Petroleum R. Seismology G. French, Oregon Beneath Crustal Computed pp. 341-352. Keys, Rakus, Mem. pp. 167-199. central A. Wiley and
Lillie, Mayerové, Mooney, and Mooney, Ue A. Rybach, Sheriff, Shor, Talwani, tion Telford, W. Tomek, Trimpy, R. K. Warren, D. crust

refraction the basins, in Society of An Earth: Cambridge: Geophysics E, Vera, M. T. and at expanding Research, coast the measure- v. 68, velocity Andreas Bulletin 65, v. struc- refraction Research, states, in of Geophysics and Smith 1986, measurements offshore and active for and Basin States, Journal of anom- mountain 88, v. to Blackwell and J. D. Santa the seism

Seismic the mid-Atlantic ridge, and Geological Solid 10 Detrick, from along refraction Research, Seismic San the California, America, Crustal 1965, 1. Seismic coast B. R. Ladd, J. Trench D. Catchings, evidence the 1983, Gravity at Research, Introduction Boston: Trehu, of Jand-sea Constraints of wave of America, v.

1959, the Atlantic Ocean The Geophysics, Introduction S. R. Rise of Geophysical structure Geophysical 1975, of of Pichon, ridges: of Geophysical Pacific Regional by edited 152, pp. 145-174. and reflection R. Seismic beneath United lithosphere Geophysical An 1984, M. A. model California, Geophysical 1996, models
Ewing, Sea, on Sea, Bulletin, v.70, pp. 291-318. 1990, Global (2nd ed.), Toronto: W. B. Saunders Comp., 494 pp. Harding, A. J., J. A. Orcutt, M. E. Kappus, E. Buhl, Brocher, 1989, Structure of young oceanic crust Pacific Crustal seismic Peake, section Valley, Society Le Hill, D. P., 1978, Seismic evidence for the structure and the of and G. P. Eaton, Boulder, Colorado: Geological Society La

M. in Norwegian R., to Cambridge University Press, 472 pp. 1979, P. East profiles, Journal from of G. L. a Bear X. mid-ocean tectonics Tectonics Cordillera, G. refraction Middle 1993, underplating province, western A. of of Scientific Publications, 296 pp. Channel, experiment, W.
and M. D., Mutter, the v. 94, pp. 12163-12196. 1963, Journal and along near and R. measurements, Journal of America, Memoir K., M., Mooney, and flexure Journal M. A. 1983, Letters, v. 10, pp. 933-936. B. mantle
l., measurements Mediterranean C. G. on H., California pp. 5777-5787. H., Seismological 1177-1197. of the v.70, pp. 318-339. Western A. pp. 5643-5649. D., and pp. 10449-10477. and W. and Range 1591-1607.
J. the America Introduction C. N spread J. ments, J. Structure Cenozoic Cenozoic Seismic the D. magmatic Range G. ranges, P. Geophysical B., Stierman, Barbara refraction K., Bulletin
Ewing, in Fowler, Garland, J. 13° Healy, of Healy, Fault pp. Heirtzler, J. ture the Ibrahim, in Jarchow, C. W. Karner, alies Kearey, Keller, Koch, upper and pp.

velocities for the models in be might how they of error. sources recorded profile single dipping interface model, interpret dip interface; b) the B. and 2.0 changing of section the for P-wave velocities thicknesses crustal the N 47° along section (a). in illustrated Geological 172, pp. 103-128. Geophysical to Introduction McGraw-Hill, York: New San from structure from Nevada, Eureka,

and actual differences and possible refraction reversed below and below points A L— cross a draw add for reasons cross a draw you and W. D. Mooney, Boulder, Colorado: Society of America, Memoir 1976, ed.), (3rd Crustal 1963, to California, Geophysical Research, pp. 5789-5806. Crustal from California Northern of of Mines Division The basin, Quarterly Journal of the Royal Astronomical
thicknesses to and differences a of above Jayers Shot at A Shot at B 4.16), (Fig. 4.15, Fig. Discuss your cross section. 4.17, Fig. thickness changes a B., M. Prospecting 446 pp. P, J. Francisco, seismic-refraction 1966, P., J. central Geology California pp. 419-426. 1965, M., Society, v. 6, pp. 10-27.

Interpretation layer crustal the error. List results shows at B. Assuming a the for velocity to the interface vertically memes sat America From b) latitude. ¢) section. cross on illustrated in maps European for the crustal Nevada Dobrin, sounding their contri- and Eaton, of Its Earth: ed.), Eaton, the of NJ: Ewing, of margin of the Pakiser

Refraction how differences in Exercise 4-3 might be due below graph at A, then true a) depths é a North of map N 40° your to central reasons Sierra 1967, 158, pp. 1407-1417. seismic deep and Geology Academy Slovak the of (2nd Evolution Pub. Co., 403 pp. geophysics Cliffs, P. Riddihough, 1989, The crustal continental C. L. by edited

Seismic to interpretation travel-time shotpoint inversion: interface; c) 20- the on along depth mantle mantle velocities you the on Discuss Eaton, of bution to solution of contact of Alpine system with Czechoslovak Bratislava: Interior The and Exploration Englewood western North America, in: Geophysical Framework States,

Discuss Fig. 4.9a and due the through Based Moho uppermost Based latitude. b) BIBLIOGRAPHY P. J. and Results measurements in Czechoslovakia platform, 1982, Constitution New York: Elsevier Science 1992, subsurface, R. the United

Chapter4 d) The 4-5 with of the a) 4-6 and a) 4-7 SELECTED C., P. batholith, Science, v. 1978, B., European Tectonics, Global Sciences, pp. 248-256. P., H. M. Structure, R., H. shallow Prentice Hall,Inc.,489 pp. Couch, R. W., and of structure Continental

98 Bateman, Berdnek, Bott, Burger,