Page 300 - Fluid Power Engineering
P. 300

266   Chapter Twelve


              government agencies to receive information about proposed wind
              farms and to respond with a determination of radar interference. Thus
              far, submission of wind farm data to NTIA is voluntary; NTIA col-
              lects objections from the government agencies and responds in about
              45 days.
                 The FAA also provides an online evaluation tool for prescreening
              of sites with respect to impact on long-range and weather radars
              https://oeaaa.faa.gov/oeaaa/external/gisTools/gisAction.jsp?action
              =showLongRangeRadarToolForm. Its scope is: (a) Air Defense and
              Homeland Security Radar; (b) weather surveillance radar; and (c)
              military operations.
                 The outcome of the analysis is a map around the user-specified
              location with three colored regions that describe the impact to air de-
              fense and homeland security radars: Green (no impact), yellow (im-
              pact likely), and red (impact highly likely). An example of such an
              analysis for a location in the state of Oklahoma is seen in Figure 12-4.



        References
              1. National Research Council. Environmental Impacts of Wind Energy Projects,
                The National Academies Press, Washington, DC , 2007.
              2. Sokka, L., Koskela, S., and Sepp¨al¨a, J. Life cycle inventory analysis of elec-
                tricity production from hard coal-Including data on Polish coal mines and
                a Finnish coal-fired power plant [Online] 2005. http://www.energia.ee/
                OSELCA/files/Hard coal overview.pdf.
              3. Baerwald, E. F., D’Amours, G. H., Klug, B. J., and Barclay, R. M. R. “Baro-
                trauma is a significant cause of bat fatalities at wind turbines.”Current
                Biology, Cell Biology, 18: 695–696, August, 2008.
              4. US Fish & Wildlife Service. Wind turbine guidelines advisory committee.
                USFWS Habitat and resource conservation [Online] 2010. http://www.
                fws.gov/habitatconservation/windpower/wind turbine advisory
                committee.html.
              5. USFWS Wind Turbine Guidelines Advisory Committee Synthesis Work-
                group. Draft recommended guidelines. USFWS [Online] December
                16, 2009. http://www.fws.gov/habitatconservation/windpower/Wind
                FAC Synthesis Workgroup Draft Recommendations v6.1.pdf.
              6. Illinois Department of Natural Resources. EcoCAT. Illinois DNR [Online]
                http://www.dnr.state.il.us/orep/ecocat/srchcnsltns.asp.
              7. A Guide to Noise Control in Minnesota, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency,
                St. Paul, MN, 2008.
              8. Nielsen, Per. WindPRO 2.5 Users Guide. EMD International, Aalborg,
                Denmark, 2006.
              9. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). PART 77–OBJECTS AFFECT-
                ING NAVIGABLE AIRSPACE. 2004 CFR Title 14, Volume 2 [Online]
                National Archives and Records Administration, 2004. http://www.
                access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/waisidx 04/14cfr77 04.html.
              10. Sengupta, D. L., and Senior, T. “Electromagnetic Interference from Wind
                Turbines,” Wind Technology, D. Spera,Chapter 9, ASME Press, New York,
                NY, 1994.
   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305