Page 227 - Wind Energy Handbook
P. 227

AERODYNAMIC PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT                                     201


                                                        Actual
                                                        power
                                                        curve
                         Wind
                         turbine                               Power
                         power                                 curve
                                                               distorted
                                                               by binning

















                        Wind
                        speed
                        probability








                                                Wind speed
                                  Figure 4.24  Biasing Effect with Binning




             correlation is to measure the wind much closer to the wind turbine. Some years
             ago, at Rutherford Appleton Laboratory (RAL) in the UK, for a downwind machine,
             the wind speed was measured by using a boom mounted anemometer located only
             one radius upwind of the rotor. As close as one radius distance from the wind
             turbine some retarding (velocity deficit) will be apparent. The easiest way to take
             account of this is to determine experimentally the relationship between the boom
             anemometer reading and the measured free wind speed. Figure 4.25 shows the
             uncorrected power curve based on the boom anemometer readings and shows that
             the results for the different averaging times are in close agreement, as expected,
             since high correlations were achieved.
               Figures 4.26 to 4.29 show the effect of applying Dragt’s correction directly to
             measurements made on a 17 m, stall-regulated wind turbine at RAL. It is evident
             that 1 min averaged data, when corrected, is preferable to 10 min averaging due to
             the extended parameter ranges achieved. The similarity of the corrected results
             derived from the differently averaged data lends confidence to the technique.
   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232