Page 115 - Writing Winning Business Proposals
P. 115

106                                Writing Winning Business Proposals


                          and recommend solutions in a situation that was ill defined, to put it mildly.
                          Recognizing that these three ideas (complexity, change, and working together)
                          were key issues to be addressed during the proposed project, he used them (and
                          others) as themes throughout the document.
                            In the first sentence, he subtly suggests three of the themes we will discuss
                          here:


                               we appreciated being included in the evolution [i.e., “change”] of your think-
                               ing on this difficult project [“complexity”] and our potential involvement
                               [“working together”].

                          After narrating the past, present, and future of the improved operating concept in
                          the next two paragraphs, he concentrates on two of the themes, beginning with
                          “Yet the breadth of these changes.” From there on, he uses complex, change, and
                                                                                        1
                          related words 10 times and heightens the effect through parallelism  (“breadth of
                          these changes,” “exceptional magnitude of the change,” “depth of the change”). He
                          also uses many “additive” transitions (Indeed, Yet, Next, In addition, and Finally)
                          to create a crescendo effect. The flourish comes in the last sentence, which is
                          signaled by “Finally,” underscored in importance by “no precedent exists,” and
                          concluded by a phrase—“complex change”—that uses both themes together.
                            The writer doesn’t pretend that the task is less than arduous or that he has
                          performed numerous studies similar to this one. Instead, he recognizes my con-
                          cerns (my story) and makes them his own. He knows that I’m anxious and that
                          my colleagues are anxious, and he even intentionally writes the section to make
                          me anxious, to make me recall my anxiety and the high risk involved. But at pre-
                          cisely the right point, in that last sentence, he compliments my organization by
                          suggesting that if any firm can weather the coming storm, it is RST. Well, maybe
                          RST. “Perhaps” RST. Despite the compliment, he implies that we cannot do it
                          alone; despite our considerable resources and expertise, additional support and
                          abilities are crucial. That support is underscored by the document’s next heading
                          (which I haven’t included). “How We Can Work Together” begins the methods
                          slot, and it continues the proposal’s third theme, “working together.”
                            By selecting and playing the right themes, then, the writer demonstrates to me
                          that he understands far more than just the logics of my situation. By the time I
                          finish reading the first section of his proposal, he has reinforced the qualities I
                          saw in him during our several hours of preproposal discussions: his sensitivity to
                          the complexity of human organizations (including mine) and the cultural shocks
                          resulting from change and his ability to work with me and my people construc-
                          tively and competently to implement change. As a result, he increases his and his
                          organization’s credibility. He makes me an accepting rather than an objecting
                          or rejecting reader, one much more inclined to agree with his proposal’s later
   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120