Page 112 - CULTURE IN THE COMMUNICATION AGE
P. 112

THE  QUESTION  OF  CULTURAL  GENDER

            gender – such as culture-specific views on women’s mental endurance, their
            special competencies and inabilities, their great moral responsibilities, and their
            symbolic and social domains – could be more important indicators than the
            typical focus on sexuality and desire.
              David Chaney’s idea of ‘sensibility’ comes quite close to this. By sensibility
            he means ‘a way of referring to a perceived a ffiliation for an identifiable group
            with, for instance, certain ideas, or values, or tastes in music, food, or dress. A
            shared sensibility is not mandatory for all members, and may . . . vary between
            genders within a particular community so that sensibilities play across other
            more established ways of life . . . The theme of sensibility is then another aspect
            of delineating identities’ (Chaney 1996: 126).
              Chaney  refers  to  research  reported  by  Csikszentmihalyi  and  Rochberg-
            Halton (1981). When asked to nominate their most cherished objects, ‘Males
            mention  significantly  more  TV,  stereo  sets,  sports  equipment,  vehicles,  and
            trophies. Females more often mention photographs, sculpture, plants, plates,
            glass,  and  textiles’  (Csikszentmihalyi  and  Rochberg-Halton:  106).  These
            gendered domains of media, popular culture, and everyday life are clearly very
            important in producing and maintaining gender traditions. Studies of cultural
            behavior in Brazil (Tufte 1999), Sweden (Jansson 1999), China (Lull 1991),
            and Finland (Liikkanen 1996b) all indicate that men tend to choose action, and
            sports-oriented activities, while women prefer different media genres – drama
            and music, for instance. Furthermore, it is easier for women to step over into
            male cultural domains than it is for males to enter the female cultural spheres.

                                 More cultural sensitivity

            Deconstructing the history of feminist and gender research, and how gender
            has  been  theorized,  reveals  its  powerful  contextualities  and  situatedness.
            International debates about women have always reflected a very strong Anglo-
            American  bias,  which  in  turn  has  influenced a great deal of theoretical and
            empirical work outside the United Kingdom and the United States. Indeed, to
            some extent Anglo-American feminist traditions have even colonized localities
            inside  the  Western  hemisphere.  This  is  especially  true  of  feminist-oriented
            research undertaken in the fields of media and cultural studies.
              However, as Angela McRobbie (1997) points out, major di fferences inside
            the  Anglo-American  world  have  also  arisen.  In  her  own  British  intellectual
            trajectory from the 1970s onward, the accent initially was on ‘feminist material-
            ism’. McRobbie says that what is perhaps most relevant to later feminist cul-
            tural  studies,  however,  is  the  fact  that  research  combined  a  culturalist  and
            materialist perspective, and was very much focused on ‘the history and culture
            of working-class women and girls at home, in the community, in school, in
            leisure, and at work’ (McRobbie 1997: 171). Comparing the various turns of
            feminist research, McRobbie argues that ‘in the UK feminist intellectual work
            has grown out of a more socialist tradition. There has been much less concern

                                          101
   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117