Page 115 - CULTURE IN THE COMMUNICATION AGE
P. 115

MIRJA  LIIKKANEN

                make the gender hierarchy more invisible. These structures and modes of being and
                doing things are deep-seated and extremely slow to change. The sociocultural site of
                all this gender work, of course, is everyday life, where the gendered modes of being are
                reproduced and broken through the most ordinary of communication practises
                (Liikkanen 1996b, Rantalaiho 1997).

                                       References
             Aaltonen,  S.  and  Härkönen,  R.  (eds)  (1999).  ‘Naisasiaa  vai  ei’.  Helsingin  Sanomat,
                Kuukausiliite, May.
             Abercrombie, N. and Longhurst, B. (1998). Audiences: A Sociological Theory of Imagination.
                London, Thousand Oaks and New Delhi: Sage Publications.
             Anttonen, A. (1997). Feminismi ja sosiaalipolitiikka: Miten sukupuolesta tehtiin yhteiskunta-
                teoreettinen ja sosiaalipoliittinen avainkäsite. Tampere: Tampere University Press.
             Apo, S. (1999). Women in Finland. Helsinki: Otava Publishing Co. Ltd.
             Bell, D., Binnie, J., Cream, J., and Valentine, G. (1994). ‘All hyped up and no place to
                go’.Gender, Place and Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography, 1 /1: 31–47.
             Brunsdon, C. (1997). Screen Tastes: Soap Opera to Satellite Dishes. London: Routledge.
             Chaney, D. (1996). Lifestyles. London: Routledge.
             Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
             Csikszentmihalyi, M. and Rochberg-Halton, E. (1981). The Meaning of Things: Domestic
                Symbols and the Self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
             Eskola,  K.  (1999).  ‘Culture  –  the  empowerment  of  women’s  lives’.  In  Women  in
                Finland. Helsinki: Otava Publishing Co. Ltd.
             Hebdige, D. (1979). Subculture: The Meaning of Style. London: Methuen.
             Heiskanen, T. and Rantalaiho, L. (1997). ‘Persistence and change of gendered practises’.
                In L. Rantalaiho and T. Heiskanen (eds), Gendered Practices in Working Life. London:
                Macmillan.
             Jansson, A. (1999). A Matter of Attitude – Outline to a Phenomenology of Media Culture.
                Presented to the 14th Nordic Conference of Media and Communication Research,
                Kungälv, Sweden.
             Lehto, A.-M. (1999). ‘Women in working life in Finland’. In Women in Finland. Helsinki:
                Otava Publishing Co. Ltd.
             Liikkanen, M. (1996a). ‘Culture consumption in Finland: Distinctive characteristics’.
                The Nordicom Review of Nordic Research on Media & Communication. Special issue.
             ——  (1996b). Culture Consumption and Leisure Meanings in Cultural Change of Society.
                Licentiate dissertation. Department of Sociology, University of Helsinki.
             —— (1998). ‘Taideyleisöpuhe ja suomalaisuus’. In Pertti Alasuutari and Petri Ruuska
                (eds),  Elävänä  Euroopassa:  Muuttuva  suomalainen  identiteetti.  Tampere:  Osuuskunta
                Vastapaino.
             Liikkanen,  R.  (1999).  ‘Sosiologia  on  arjen  taikureiden  tiede’.  Helsingin  Sanomat.  C6
                (Kulttuuri). 10 May.
             Lloyd, M. (1999). ‘Performativity, parody, politics’. Theory, Culture & Society  16: 195–213.
             Lull, J. (1991). China Turned On: Television, Reform, and Resistance. London: Routledge.
             —— (2000). Media, Communication, Culture: A Global Approach (revised ed.). Cambridge:
                Polity Press; New York: Columbia University Press.
             McRobbie, A. (1991). Feminism and Youth Culture. From Jackie to Just Seventeen. London:
                Macmillan.

                                           104
   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120