Page 156 - CULTURE IN THE COMMUNICATION AGE
P. 156

SUPERCULTURE  FOR  THE  COMMUNIC ATION  AG E

            usual critical arguments made against communications technology as nothing
            more than tools of imperialism don’t shed much light either. Instead of simply
            reproducing conditions of domination and repression, the market has created a
            rich source of material and symbolic resources which ultimately challenge the
            hegemony of state institutions. Where all this is headed, though, is anyone’s guess.


                                     Civilizations
               ‘A big hug from Chile to all the Mexican people!’
                     (Chilean broadcast journalist reporting the presidential election
                    victory in Chile of Ricardo Lagos to the Mexican national radio
                                                      system, January 2000)

            To a great extent our mediated and unmediated experiences re flect immersion
            in the civilizations to which we belong. This fact may seem quite unremark-
            able,  perhaps  even  self-evident,  but  the  very  idea  that  differing  civilizations
            demarcate global cultural organization with serious political consequences has
            generated much controversy in academic circles.
              Although he was by no means the first to talk about culture in terms of
            broad civilizational groupings and alignments, Samuel P. Huntington stirred a
            tremendous reaction, certainly not all of it favorable, when his book  The Clash
            of Civilizations was published in 1996. Part of the critical response to the book
            stems from many intellectuals’ unwillingness to accept what they consider its
            main premises to be: that civilizations are essential human groupings, and that
            human conflict based on these essential differences is inevitable. Huntington
            argues, for instance, that:

               Civilizations are the ultimate human tribes, and the clash of civiliza-
               tions is tribal conflict on a global scale . . . Cold peace, cold war, trade
               war, quasi war, uneasy peace, troubled relations, intense rivalry, com-
               petitive  coexistence,  arms  races:  these  phrases  are  . . .  descriptions
               of  relations  between  entities  from  different  civilizations.  Trust  and
               friendship will be rare.
                                                    (Huntington 1996: 207)

            A Harvard professor and former American government adviser on national
            security issues, Huntington interprets global cultural trends in ways that re flect
            his understanding and promotion of American national interests. However, we
            are not concerned here with the political implications and pessimistic cultural
            predictions Huntington makes. I am interested not in defending or interro-
            gating the politics or subtleties of The Clash of Civilizations but in using the
            main  theme  of  the  book  for  establishing  civilization  as  a  primary  cultural
            resource for supercultural formation. Even Huntington’s most strident critics
            must grant that his dissertation on civilizations is extraordinarily comprehensive.

                                          145
   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161