Page 120 - Materials Chemistry, Second Edition
P. 120

104  3 Life Cycle Inventory Analysis


                     System 1                   System 2
                      Inputs      Inputs         Inputs


                      Production   Production     Production
                        system      system         system
                         for          for            for
                       product A   product B      product C



                                  y kg product B

                          y kg co-product B
                                                  z kg product C
                      x kg product A

                           System boundary
                    Figure 3.16  Providing equal benefit by subtraction of an equivalent system.


                    other production systems of B, the system gets more and more complex. Thus
                    even system expansions do not always provide unambiguous results and require
                    substantially more data. If supplementary data cannot be procured they have to be
                    estimated, another issue of uncertainty in the assessment.
                      As an alternative for an expansion of the fU, a comparison between A and C
                    can be maintained if the environmental loads related to the production of B are
                    subtracted fromA(credit).
                      This so-called avoided burden approach can only figure as system expansion if
                    the considered system boundaries of system 1 and system 2 are symmetrical.
                    The advantage of this approach consists in the simple fU. Arbitrariness remains,
                    however, concerning the choice of an equivalent production system for B and the
                    data demand increases.
                      Ekvall and Weidema 97)  distinguish between retrospective or attributional (clas-
                    sical) 98)  and prospective or consequential LCAs where system modelling is based
                    on market driven future scenarios. Some reasons are provided on why system
                    expansions are more difficult in retrospective LCAs: in addition to the difficulties
                    already mentioned it is a fact that in retrospective LCAs a representation of the
                    status quo is given raising doubts on system expansions with alternative produc-
                    tion lines. For prospective LCAs system expansions is exemplified as to be always
                    recommendable and declared as the method of choice. Only the development of

                    97)  Ekvall, 1999; Weidema, 2000; Weidema, Frees and Nielsen, 1999.
                    98)  The designation retrospective for traditional or classical LCA with constant economical back-
                        ground is misleading, as in this form of assessment, by far the most predominant world-wide,
                        comparisons with new products or products under development can be made.
   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125