Page 102 - The ISA Handbook in Contemporary Sociology

9781412934633-Chap-05 1/10/09 10:21 AM Page 73

LAW THROUGH SOCIOLOGY’S LOOKING GLASS 73

Ellickson, R. C. (1991) Order Without Macaulay, S. (1963) ‘Non-Contractual Relations
Law. Cambridge Mass.: Harvard University in Business’, American Sociological Review,
Press. 28: 55–67.
Ferrari, V. (1989) ‘Sociology of Law: Nelken, David (1998) ‘Blinding Insights? The
A Theoretical Introduction’, in V. Ferrari and Limits of a Reflexive Sociology of Law’,
P. Uusitalo, Two Lectures on the Sociology of Journal of Law and Society, 25: 407–26.
Law. Helsinki: University of Helsinki, Petrazycki, L. (1955) Law and Morality.
Sociology of Law Series, 6(101): 7–31. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Foucault, M. (1997) The Birth of the Clinic. Pound, R. (1943) ‘Sociology of Law and
London: Routledge. Originally publ. in 1963. Sociological Jurisprudence’, University of
Fredman, S. (2002) Discrimination and Human Toronto Law Journal, 5(1): 1–20.
Rights: The Case of Racism. Oxford: Oxford Raz, J. (1979) The Authority of Law. Oxford:
University Press. Clarendon Press.
Friedman, L. M. (1986) ‘The Law and Society Sarat, A. (2000) ‘Pain, Powerlessness, and the
Movement’, Stanford Law Review, 38: Promises of Interdisciplinary Legal Scholarship’,
763–80. Windsor Year Book of Access to Justice.
Galligan, D. J. (2006) Law in Modern Society. pp. 187–212.
Oxford: Oxford University Press. Sarat, A. and Silbey, S. (1988) ‘The Pull of the
Goffman, E. (1983) ‘The Interaction Order’, Policy Audience’, Law and Policy, 10: 98–166.
American Sociological Review, 48: 1–17. Simon, J. (1999) ‘Law after Society’, Law and
Griffiths, J. (1986) ‘What is Legal Pluralism’, Social Inquiry, 24: 143–94.
Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Stjernquist, P. (2001) Organised Cooperation
Law, 24: 1–55. Facing Law: An Anthropological Study.
Gurvitch, G. (1947) Sociology of Law. London: Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.
Routledge & Kegan. Sutton, J. (2001) Law/Society: Origins, Interaction,
Habermas, J. (1996) Between Facts and Norms. and Change. London: Pine Forge Press.
Cambridge: Polity Press. Tamanaha, B. (1997) Realistic Socio-Legal
Halliday, T. C. and Janowitz. M. (1992) Theory: Pragmatic and Social Theory of Law.
Sociology and its Public: The Forms and Fates Oxford: Clarendon Press.
of Disciplinary Organization. Chicago: The Thomas, P. (1997) ‘Socio-Legal Studies: The
University of Chicago Press. Case of Disappearing Fleas and Bustards’, in
Haplin, A. (2001) Reasoning With Law. Oxford: Phil Thomas (ed.) Socio-Legal Studies.
Hart Publishing. Aldershot: Dartmouth. pp. 1–22.
Hart, H. L. A. (1998) The Concept of Law. Tiller, E. H. and Cross, F. B. (2006) ‘What is
Oxford: Oxford University Press, reprint. Legal Doctrine’, Northwestern University Law
Hoefeld, W. (1923) Fundamental Legal Review, 100: 517–33.
Conceptions. New Haven, Conn.: Yale Travers, M. (2001) ‘Sociology of Law in Britain’,
University Press. American Sociologist, 32: 26–40.
Kelsen, H. (2001) Introduction to the Problems Tuitt, P. (2005) Race, Law, Resistance. London:
of Legal Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press, GlasHouse Press.
reprint. Originally publ. in 1934. Vick, D. W. (2004) ‘Interdisciplinarity and the
Lacey, N. (2004) A Life of H. L. A. Hart: The Discipline of Law’, Journal of Law and Society,
Nightmare and the Noble Dream. Oxford: 31: 163–93.
Oxford University Press. Wheeler, S. and Thomas, P. (2002) ‘Socio-Legal
Luhmann, N. (1985) A Sociological Theory of Studies’, in David J. Hayton (ed.) Law’s Future(s).
Law. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. Oxford: Hart Publishing. pp. 267–80.