Page 106 - The ISA Handbook in Contemporary Sociology
P. 106

9781412934633-Chap-06  1/10/09  8:46 AM  Page 77





                                           RELATING AUTHORITY AND SOLIDARITY                  77


                    feeling of belonging that nationhood con-  plans to affect it replaced the conventional
                    ferred upon individuals. In this political-  model with a new one that includes commu-
                    cultural framework, the national state came to  nity and solidarity as elements amenable to
                    be perceived not only as the European histor-  rationalizing initiatives, whether one calls
                    ical path, but also as the natural development  them social capital, trust, associativeness, or
                    of modern society. People got used to think-  other related notions.  The idea that, like
                    ing of societies and nations as equivalents,  authority and market mechanisms, societal
                    and of both as circumscribed by the territory  resources can be rationally planned to attain
                    of nation-states. In that context, national   goals, finds a parallel in the revival of civil
                    citizenship became the ideal type of modern  society in public discourse.
                    collective identity.  The successful nation-  Rescued from the past, after a long period
                    state should be able to convert citizenship  of oblivion, if not open deprecation
                    into the prime identifier of a collectivity or a  (Alexander, 1998; Cohen and Arato, 1992;
                    ‘society’ as nations became synonymous  Keane, 1988a; b; Pérez-Diáz, 1993), nowa-
                    with societies.                         days civil society has come to stand for the
                      The impact of the nation-state as an ideol-  bright side of the world, one of the virtuous
                    ogy was overwhelming in the Developing  components of collective life. The return of
                    World. To begin with, the idea of a basic right  ‘civil society’ to daily discourse reveals an
                    to self-determination that inspired decolo-  interesting fact.  While the expression
                    nization did not refer to communities of any  assumed quite distinct overtones, depending
                    other nature, but to people as members of  on the context, everywhere it conveys the
                    nation-states. Other clusters of solidarity  idea of healthy social forces to curb excesses
                    were underestimated, if not openly equated  of either authority or market influences (Van
                    with obstacles to progress.  The hopes for  Rooy, 1998).  As Hall (1995: 2) observed,
                    economic growth, development and modern-  civil society became ‘at one and the same
                    ization were interlaced with ideas that mixed  time a social value and a set of social institu-
                    in variable combinations of authority and  tions’. That it was meant to convey the notion
                    market resources. In the perspective of polit-  of a reaction to political and/or economic
                    ical activists, reforms and revolutions consti-  malaise in very different contexts is quite
                    tuted means to make possible efficient use of  clear, if we observe that civil society became
                    market and/or authority. Among scholars and  an epitome of democracy in former commu-
                    policy makers, we observe a similar outlook.  nist countries as well as in former state-led
                    Looking at the classic development literature  capitalist dictatorships in Latin America. In
                    of the 1950s and 1960s, a clear pattern  both contexts, together with the concept of
                    emerges: prescriptions for growth were  citizenship, civil society replaced old slogans
                    essentially plans for the efficient use of  in the democratic discourse.  While previ-
                    market and/or authority initiatives. Solidarity  ously, even in some academic circles, the
                    did not constitute an instrumental resource in  notion of citizenship was considered a
                    those plans, but rather the ‘natural’ stuff  ‘bourgeois mystification’, in the post bi-polar
                    sociability is made of.                 era, it has become a redeeming idea, a cher-
                      The specialized literature did recognize  ished value. One could say that now any pos-
                    that solidarity feelings might even be restric-  itive image of social life stresses the role of
                    tive, pulling apart tribes, clans, ethnic or reli-  active citizens to revitalize civil society so as
                    gious groups. Yet, in the authors’ accounts,  to compensate for the shortcomings of both
                    such feelings were always there, as a sort of  state and market.
                    residual ground binding people together   At the same time that the call for an active
                    while often preventing them from taking  society becomes increasingly strong, one
                    rationally planned decisions. It was only in  also observes clear signs that the image and
                    recent decades that images of social life and  role of both market and state actors experience
   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111