Page 107 - The ISA Handbook in Contemporary Sociology
P. 107

9781412934633-Chap-06  1/10/09  8:46 AM  Page 78





                   78                THE ISA HANDBOOK IN CONTEMPORARY SOCIOLOGY


                   significant changes.  The idea of corporate  namely the  so-called Non-Governmental
                   social responsibility, which has become so  Organizations. My purpose here will be just
                   important within the entrepreneurial world,  to search for a general picture of such an
                   is a good indication that a new moral code is  actor, and, in the process, reflect on questions
                   gaining currency (Carroll, 1999; Garriga and  that its presence raises. More precisely, look-
                   Melé, 2004; Hemingway and Maclagan,     ing at NGOs in Brazil, I seek to draw their
                   2004; Zadek, 2004). The new market moral-  profile and, more important, formulate
                   ity has been interpreted in various ways. For  new research questions that might help us to
                   some, it is mainly a marketing strategy, that  shed light on their structures and the roles
                   is, it creates a false solidarity between the  they play.
                   suppliers and the consumer market, manipu-
                   lated by the former. For others, the new man-
                   agerial welfare is a sort of natural return to
                   voluntary action given the state’s retreat from  NEW ACTORS ON STAGE
                   welfare initiatives under the pressure of neo-
                   liberal forces. For my purposes here, it is not  The rediscovery of civil society in recent
                   relevant to test if these or other hypotheses  decades finds an echo in a new wave of vol-
                   for the rise of corporate social responsibility  untary associations, social movements,
                   prove true. I want simply to draw attention to  strategies to build up social capital, investiga-
                   the fact that the conventional solutions that  tions into the sources of social trust, and sim-
                   modern society had reached for providing  ilar phenomena (Anheier and  Themudo,
                   social goods have been brought into ques-  2002; Della Porta and  Tarrow, 2005;
                   tion. In my view, the fact that the state shares  Fernandes, 1994; Keck and Sikkink, 1999;
                   welfare provision with other models that  Khagram et al., 2002). I take these develop-
                   ensure solidarity has not received the atten-  ments as manifestations of the deep transfor-
                   tion it deserves among sociologists.    mations in the way society perceives itself
                     At the same time that corporate social  and its basic resources of organization, as
                   responsibility gains salience, the adoption of  discussed above. Common to all of them is
                   market principles within structures of author-  the emphasis on solidarity resources as dis-
                   ity, the vivid claims for new government  tinct from state authority or market-based
                   management we hear in different corners of  interests. The new labels that describe civil
                   the world, suggest that elements typical of  society actors – non-governmental organiza-
                   the market have permeated the state.  That  tions, third sector, solidary sector, etc. – point
                   government should behave like lean firms  clearly to alternative means to state and
                   and that firms should fulfill welfare functions  market. Civil society actors are supposed to
                   have become as much current values as the  provide crucial ingredients to social life,
                   idea that civil society has to compensate for  things that are either absent or badly supplied
                   the deficiencies of both state and market  by the traditional authority and market-
                   resources.                              interest mechanisms.
                     To decipher the deep meaning of this sort  One has to bear these developments in
                   of cultural revolution that puts into question  mind in order to understand the significance
                   the conventional meanings of authority,  that the so-called NGOs have come to
                   market, and solidarity, sociology’s agendas  acquire all over the world (Clarke, 1998;
                   must tackle the changes in progress from  Clayton, 1996; Fowler, 1997; Landim, 1988;
                   multiple angles.  What I intend next is to  OECD, 1988; Salamon and Anheier, 1996;
                   explore, in a preliminary way, one of the  Wapner, 1995). For some, they are the natu-
                   issues that I consider relevant to such an  ral consequence of the weakening of national
                   agenda. I will focus my attention on one   states challenged by globalization. For
                   of the new social actors in civil society,  others, they express rather the impatience of
   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112