Page 211 - The ISA Handbook in Contemporary Sociology

9781412934633-Chap-12 1/10/09 8:48 AM Page 182

182 THE ISA HANDBOOK IN CONTEMPORARY SOCIOLOGY

Bourdieu, Pierre (S. Emmanuel, trans.) (1996) DiMaggio, Paul (2000) ‘The Production of
The Rules of Art: Genesis and Structure of Scientific Change: Richard Peterson and the
the Literary Field. Cambridge: Harvard Institutional Turn in Cultural Sociology’,
University Press. Poetics, 28: 107–36.
Bourdieu, Pierre, Darbel, Alain and Schnapper, Dowd, Timothy (2002) ‘Culture and
Dominique (1991/1969). The Love of Art: Commodification: Technology and Structural
European Art Museums and their Public. Power in the Early U.S. Recording Industry’,
Cambridge: Polity Press. International Journal of Sociology and Social
Burrell, G. and Morgan, G. (1982) ‘In Search of Policy, 22(1–3): 106–40.
a Framework’, Sociological Paradigms and Ellison, Mike and Donegan, Lawrence (1993)
Organisational Analysis. London: Heinemen. ‘Cadillac Terrorists Carve Up Sculptor’, The
pp. 1–37. Guardian, November 24: 26.
Button, Virgina (1999) The Turner Prize. 2nd Farson, Daniel (1993) ‘A Turner for the
edn. London: Tate Gallery. Worse’, The Mail on Sunday Review,
Canguilhem, Georges (1975) ‘Du singulier et November 28: 29.
de la singularité en epistémologie Fiske, John (1993) Power Plays, Power Works.
biologique’, Études d’histoire et de philoso- London: Polity.
phie des sciences. 3e Édition. Paris: Vrin. pp. Florida, Richard (2002) The Rise of the Creative
211–25. Class. NY: Basic.
Clifford, James (1998) ‘On Collecting Art and Fournier, M. and Roy-Valex, M. (2002) ‘Art
Culture’, in Nicholas Mirzoeff (ed.) The Visual contemporain et internationalisation. Les
Culture Reader. NY: Routledge. pp. 94–107. galeries québécoises et les foires’, Sociologie
Cooper, Tim (1993) ‘The Turner Winner and My et Sociétés, XXXIV(2): 41–62.
Night with the Art “Terrorists”’, The Evening Gamboni, Dario (1983) ‘Méprises et Mépris.
Standard, November 24: 13. Éléments pour une étude de l’iconoclasme
Crane, Diana (1987) The Transformation of the contemporain,’ Actes de la recherche en
Avant–Garde: The NY Art World, sciences sociales, Septembre 1983, 49: 2–28.
1940–1985. Chicago: University of Chicago Gamboni, Dario (1997) The Destruction of Art:
Press. Iconoclasm and Vandalism since the French
DeNora, Tia (2000) Music in Everyday Life. Revolution. London: Reaktion.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Graham-Dixon, Andrew (1993) ‘I Don’t Know
DeNora, Tia (2003) After Adorno. Rethinking Much About Art, But I Know What I Hate ...’,
Music Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge The Independent, November 24, n.p. Turner
University Press. Prize Clipping, Tate Gallery Archives.
DiMaggio, Paul (1986) ‘Cultural Entrepreneurship Griswold, Wendy (2000) Bearing Witness:
in Nineteenth-Century Boston’, Nonprofit Readers, Writers, and the Novel in Nigeria.
Enterprise in the Arts: Studies in Mission and Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Constraint. NY: Oxford University Press. pp. Halle, David (2002) ‘The Controversy over the
41–61. Sensation Show at the Brooklyn Museum’, in
DiMaggio, Paul (1991) ‘Constructing an Alberta Arthurs and Glenn Wallach (eds.)
Organizational Field as a Professional Project: Crossroads: Art and Religion in American
U.S. Art Museums, 1920–1940’, in Life. NY: The New Press. pp. 139–87.
W. P. Powell and Paul DiMaggio (eds.) The Heinich, Nathalie (1993) Du peintre à l’artiste.
New Institutionalism in Organizational Artisans et académiciens à l’âge classique,
Analysis. Chicago: University Chicago Press. Paris: Minuit.
pp. 267–92. Heinich, Nathalie (1998a) Ce que l’art fait à la
DiMaggio, Paul (1992) ‘Cultural Boundaries and sociologie. Paris: Minuit.
Structural Change: The Extension of the High Heinich, Nathalie (1998b) L’art contemporain
Culture Model to Theater, Opera, and the exposé aux rejets. Études de cas. Paris:
Dance, 1900–1940’, in M. Lamont and Éditions Jacqueline Cambon.
M. Fournier (eds.) Cultivating Differences: Heinich, Nathalie (1998c) Le triple jeu de l’art
Symbolic Boundaries and the Making of contemporain. Paris: Minuit.
Inequality. Chicago: University of Chicago Heinich, Nathalie (2002) ‘Réponse aux critiques’,
Press. pp. 21–57. Sociologie et Sociétés. XXXIV(2): 229–32.