Page 246 - The ISA Handbook in Contemporary Sociology
P. 246
9781412934633-Chap-14 1/10/09 8:49 AM Page 217
LIFECOURSE OF THE SOCIAL MOBILITY PARADIGM 217
in Family, School, and Work. Los Angeles, DiPrete, Thomas A. and McManus, Patricia A.
August 18–21. (2001) ‘The Welfare State, the Labor Market,
Brückner, Hannah and Mayer, Karl Ulrich and the Stability of Family Income: A
(2005) ‘The De-Standardization of the Comparison of the U.S. and Germany’,
Life Course: What it Might Mean and If It EurAmerica, 30: 1–46.
Means Anything Whether it Actually Took Drobnic Sonja and Blossfeld, Hans-Peter (2004)
Place’, Advances in Life Course Research, ‘Career Patterns over the Life Course:
9: 27–54. Gender, Class, and Linked Lives’, RSSM, 21:
Charles, Maria (1998) ‘Structure, Culture, and Sex 139–64.
Segregation in Europe’, RSSM, 16: 89–116. Dronkers, Jaap (1985) ‘The Recruitment of
Cohen, Yinon (1986) ‘Family Background and Directors of the Largest Dutch Firms: A Special
Economic Success through Work and Case?’, RSSM, 4: 197–215.
Marriage’, RSSM, 5: 173–97. Dumont, Louis (1966) Homo Hierarchicus: The
Colbjornsen, Tom (1988) ‘Organizing Collective Caste System and Its Implications. Chicago:
Interests: Causes of Cross-National Differences University of Chicago Press (edition 1981).
in Working-Class Formation’, RSSM, 7: Duncan, Otis D. (1961) ‘A Socioeconomic Index
247–69. for All Occupations’ in Albert J. Reiss, (ed.)
Coverdill, James (1998) ‘Personal Contacts and Occupations and Social Status. NY: Free
Post-Hire Job Outcomes: Theoretical and Press. pp. 109–38.
Empirical Notes on the Significance of Edelman, Lauren and Petterson, Stephen
Matching Methods’, RSSM, 16: 247–69. (1999) ‘Symbols and Substance in
Cuin, Charles-Henry (1993) Les sociologues et Organizational Response to Civil Rights Law’,
la mobilité sociale. Paris: PUF. RSSM, 17: 107–35.
Davis, Kingsley and Moore, Wilbert (1945) Eisenstadt, Shmuel N. (1984) ‘Ideas and
‘Functionalist Theory of Stratification: Some Interests: The Structuring of Social Hierarchies
Principles of Stratification’, American and Class Formations’, RSSM, 3: 209–36.
Sociological Review, 10: 242–9. Elder, Glen H. (1992) ‘Models of the Life Course’,
Desrosières, Alain (2002) The Politics of Large Contemporary Sociology, 21(2): 632–5.
Numbers: A History of Statistical Reasoning. Elman, Cheryl and O’Rand, Angela (1995)
Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press. ‘Midlife Work Pathways and Educational Entry’,
Dev Sharda, Bam (2005) ‘Status Allocation in Research on Aging, 1998, 20: 475–505.
Village India’, RSSM, 22: 219–54. Erikson, Robert and Goldthorpe, John H.
DiPrete, Thomas A. (2000) ‘Social Mobility’, (1992) The Constant Flux. A Study of Class
The Encyclopedia of Sociology, revised Mobility in Industrial Societies. Oxford:
edition. NY: MacMillan. Clarendon Press.
DiPrete, Thomas A., de Graaf, Paul, Luijkx, Esping-Andersen, Gøsta (1990) The Three
Ruud, Tåhlin, Michael and Blossfeld, Hans- Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge:
Peter (1997) ‘Collectivist vs. Individualist Polity Press & Princeton: Princeton University
Mobility Regimes? How Welfare State and Press.
Labor Market Structure Condition the Esping-Andersen, Gøsta (1999) Social
Mobility Effects of Structural Change in Four Foundations of Postindustrial Economies.
Countries’, American Journal of Sociology, NY: Oxford.
103: 318–58. Ferraro, Kenneth F. and Kelley-Moore, Jessica A.
DiPrete, Thomas A. and Eirich, G. M. (2006) (2003) ‘Cumulative Disadvantage and Health:
‘Cumulative Advantage as a Mechanism for Long-Term Consequences of Obesity?’,
Inequality: A Review of Theoretical and American Sociological Review, 68(5):
Empirical Developments’, Annual Review of 707–29.
Sociology, 32: 271–91. Finlay, William (1988) ‘Commitment and the
DiPrete, Thomas A. and Grusky, David B. (1990) Company: Manager–Worker Relations in
‘Structure and Trend in the Process of the Absence of Internal Labor Markets’,
Stratification for American Men and RSSM, 7: 163–87.
Women’, American Journal of Sociology, Finlay, William and Martin, Jack K. (1994) ‘What
96: 107–43. Do Employers Want and Why? A Comparative