Page 244 - The ISA Handbook in Contemporary Sociology
P. 244

9781412934633-Chap-14  1/10/09  8:49 AM  Page 215





                                       LIFECOURSE OF THE SOCIAL MOBILITY PARADIGM            215


                    (Brückner and Mayer, 2005). DiPrete (see   paradigm, which mainly asked, in three
                    DiPrete and McManus, 2001) has turned to  successive ‘generations’ of research under-
                    income as a better representation of the long-  takings, whether societies were equally fluid
                    term socio-economic position of individuals  and whether such fluidity was progressing
                    in this age of employment volatility. He has  with modernization. The mobility table was
                    introduced new factors in international com-  much used at first, and then fell into some
                    parisons besides occupational history, such  disrepute as multivariate status attainment
                    as family disruptions and welfare regimes.  models, featuring education variables, held
                    He has also contributed to the development  increasing sway. But mobility tables drew
                    of the crucial notion of cumulative advantage  attention again with the availability of more
                    (DiPrete and Eirich, 2006). Leisering (2002)  powerful modelling tools and datasets; the
                    has analyzed the interplay of government and  qualitative categories ceased, however, to serve
                    the lifecourse, paying attention to welfare  as the basis for interpretations of class experi-
                    careers as well as employment careers.  ences. As to the third element in Sorokin’s per-
                      Hout, in collaboration with Beller and  spective, the role of a multiplicity of diverse
                    Hout  (2006), has examined how cross-   institutions in sorting individuals into social
                    national differences in the association  positions, it was more or less abandoned by
                    between origins and destinations correspond  mainstream scientific work in the field.
                    to differences in both welfare regime type  More recently, however, a new paradigm
                    and access to post-secondary education.  has arguably become more important. One
                    Breen (2004) has led an effort to systemati-  key factor had been the neglect of such
                    cally compare social fluidity in eight  phenomena as increasingly volatile careers,
                    European countries whose policies are quite  complex institutional arrangements in educa-
                    different; he has focused on the situation of  tional systems, the changing role and even
                    young people (Breen, 2002), as well as on  nature of families, now often characterized by
                    the interplay between social origins, family  dual careers and instability (with attendant
                    structures and events, the characteristics of  consequences on economic positions), the
                    educational systems, and social destinations  influence of welfare regimes (which inter-
                    (Breen and Jonsson, 2005). He and his col-  vene in very different ways to help individu-
                    leagues found a declining association   als and families control their trajectories), or
                    between class origins and educational attain-  even the role of health as a mediating factor
                    ment in many countries, and raised questions  in the reproduction and transmission of social
                    about which sets of welfare and educational  inequality. In this context, a growing number
                    institutional arrangements, besides the social  of researchers are turning to the notion of the
                    democratic ones, can bring about this simi-  lifecourse as a possible way to organize these
                    larity in achievements. He has also addressed  new research findings and to shape the future
                    (with Cooke, 2005) the issue of the persist-  in this field of sociology. And of course, the
                    ence of the gendered division of domestic  field has kept its international comparative
                    labour.                                 tradition, which should serve it well as the
                                                            interplay of individual trajectories and
                                                            diverse institutional arrangements in various
                                                            countries is further explored.
                    CONCLUDING REMARKS

                    We have proposed a reading of the evolution
                    of the field of social mobility in terms of  NOTES
                    evolving paradigms. Sorokin’s seminal
                    research launched the field on many promis-  1 Among others, see for the oldest ones Bendix and
                    ing avenues. Some of his intuitions were  Lipset (1953), Lipset and Bendix (1959), Miller (1960),
                    found at the core of the original social mobility  or Pease et al. (1970) and for more recent ones
   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249