Page 240 - The ISA Handbook in Contemporary Sociology
P. 240

9781412934633-Chap-14  1/10/09  8:49 AM  Page 211





                                       LIFECOURSE OF THE SOCIAL MOBILITY PARADIGM            211


                    History Study (see, among others, Brückner  representation of social contexts with a view
                    and Mayer, 2005), examining how they    of individuals neither as simply acted upon
                    were hit by important historical events at  by society, nor as free agents; social actors
                    various ages, with different consequences  are influenced by institutions and life cir-
                    on their trajectories and life chances.  cumstances, but they also make choices
                    Blossfeld led an ambitious project compar-  among alternatives in a context of path
                    ing the effects of the globalization process  dependency (Myles, 1998).
                    on the lifecourses of individuals in fourteen  Traditional mobility tables assumed that a
                    countries, belonging to five different welfare  few key milestones (parent’s position when
                    regimes (Blossfeld et al., 2005). He exam-  ego was about 16 years old, and then ego’s
                    ined four groups: young people, males and  first position and current position) provided
                    females in mid-career, and aging workers, in  an adequate representation of the whole
                    order to see how, according to the institu-  trajectory. This assumption has now become
                    tional context of their countries, their trajec-  quite problematic. Current jobs do not
                    tories (educational, occupational, and  adequately represent economic status in a
                    familial) were impacted by new economic  context of high and increasing levels of job
                    uncertainties.                          instability. Social origin is increasingly diffi-
                      While these developments clearly represent  cult to characterize because of changing
                    major shifts, and indeed increased sophistica-  levels of homogamy/heterogamy, of family
                    tion, in the exploration of the influence of the  disruptions, and of gender differences in life
                    social environment on social mobility,  cycles.  The complexity of transitions from
                    Treiman and Ganzeboom (2000) do not iden-  school to work, and from there to retirement
                    tify them as providing a basis for the emer-  also causes difficulties for the proper identifi-
                    gence of a new paradigm. In the same vein,  cation of first and final jobs. All of these illus-
                    they deal in quite a technical way with one of  trate non-linear features of increasingly
                    the key aspects of the relationship of individ-  unstable social trajectories.  They denote
                    uals to institutions, referring to it as the prob-  anomalies in the traditional social mobility
                    lem of ‘selection bias’. What they refer to is  paradigm.
                    the fact that individuals found in particular  In their own review of the recent work of
                    social positions are not a representative cross-  Research Committee 28, Hout and DiPrete
                    section of the overall population. They get an  (2006) hint at the emergence of such a new
                    education to prepare for a specific profession,  paradigm. They identify recent advances in
                    they only work if the wages offered are high  five areas: (1) the impact of family structure
                    enough, and so on. In other words, individuals  beyond the status variables that were the core
                    make decisions in situations of complexity  of the Blau–Duncan model, (2) the impact of
                    and uncertainty; this, as we will see, is a basic  neighbourhoods, (3) the impact of school
                    tenet of the lifecourse approach.       systems, (4) the impact of labour markets,
                      We will argue that this portends the emer-  and (5) the impact of the welfare state.
                    gence of a new paradigm in the field of social  These areas are clearly more diversified
                    mobility.  Attention is paid to new and  than those cited in earlier periods; even
                    intriguing phenomena; this then leads to  more importantly, they are seen as correspon-
                    innovative results, using new methods (in  ding to rich patterns of institutional influ-
                    particular the new data provided by detailed  ence. Families evolve as the trajectories
                    retrospective life histories or ambitious  of their members change, and vice versa.
                    household panel surveys). The development  Neighbourhoods affect the lives of individu-
                    of these genuinely longitudinal methods rep-  als who live there, but they are also power-
                    resents a belated response to longstanding  fully shaped by shifts in the composition of
                    critiques against transversal approaches to  their populations. Schools do not only teach,
                    social mobility (Bertaux, 1973).  This new  they also select, track, certify in ways that vary
                    paradigm combines an increasingly rich   from one place to another. Labour markets are
   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245