Page 282 - The ISA Handbook in Contemporary Sociology
P. 282

9781412934633-Chap-17  1/10/09  10:19 AM  Page 253





                                             SOCIAL DIVISION OF HEALTH CARE                  253


                    emotions and bodies are laid bare (indeed, it  patient in a hospital, or is it something that
                    is frequently easier for the acts of care to take  the hospital as a whole accomplishes? Or
                    place between strangers, than between   again, is it the rich totality of the many rela-
                    friends or kin where issues of taboo or loss of  tions and processes constituted by a society’s
                    status arise – see Twigg, 2000: 73–4). Care  health care ‘system’ as a whole? The answer
                    work is the production of the trust without  is all of the above. As Pat Armstrong (2004)
                    which the other aspects of care as process  puts it, one needs both to lump and to slice,
                    and outcome could not happen.           that is., to try to deploy concepts dialectically
                      As the production of trust, in the context of  as a way of seizing phenomena in their
                    which intimate and even painful practices  unity-within-difference.
                    may be performed in order to restore health
                    or reduce pain, care is also tied to consent.
                    For example, states have enacted laws and
                    professional bodies have created protocols  THE RELATIONS OF PRODUCTION
                    governing consent by care recipients or those  IN/OF CARE – SOME INITIAL
                    who represent them. Consent is based on trust,  CONSIDERATIONS
                    and also on information and understanding,
                    on a sharing of objectives and values. Care is  The key question to be addressed is:  who
                    thus reflexive work, ‘entailing loops in which  cares and under what circumstances do (can)
                    recursive knowledges, emotions, and value-  they do so (Armstrong and Kits, 2003)? If
                    judgements can be reinvested in the relation-  care is work, then it can be the object of a
                    ship between producer and user’ (Maheu and  labour process analysis, that is., an analysis of
                    Bien-Aimé, 1996: 190 [my translation –  the relations of production (classic contribu-
                    PLB]; Offe, 1985).                      tions include Braverman, 1974, Burawoy,
                      Care in the abstract cannot be an adequate  1979, 1985; Hales, 1980; recent ones include
                    description of every concrete example of care  O’Doherty and  Willmot, 2001; Smith and
                    work; nor will every specific task abstracted  Thompson, 1998). Such an analysis can be
                    from the whole display every feature of  summed up in three questions. Who decides
                    labour.  Taken singly, in isolation, the vast  what is to be done? Who performs the work
                    number of practices, organizations and insti-  needed to execute what has been decided
                    tutions that make up health care, from hospi-  upon? Who enjoys the fruits of this work?
                    tals to the home, from surgery to sitting with  Imagine an abstract model of care in
                    Alzheimer’s sufferers, from dialysis to diag-  which all parties to the care relationship
                    nostic tests, might seem to involve little or no  shared in the positing of its goals, made an
                    intervention in the body (psychological  equal effort to execute the tasks required to
                    counselling) or emotional work (analyzing a  achieve those goals, and enjoyed the fruits of
                    blood sample). It is essential, however, to  that work, the bodies of all involved being
                    bear in mind that such specific examples are  the objects of labour. In such a situation of
                    the product of a given division of labour. As  perfect co-production, in which all parties
                    such they may display at best some aspect of,  actively built the relationship with each
                    and some connection to, care in general, not  other, engaging in emotion work in order to
                    care as such. It is only when they are taken as  enhance each other’s well-being, there would
                    a whole that we can grasp their interrelations  be a virtuous circle of reciprocity, a spiral of
                    and commonalities. Does health care occur  giving in which each party, rather than seek-
                    on the micro-sociological level of individual  ing to abolish the debt through payment of its
                    practices and interactions or on the    equivalent, instead perpetuated the mutual
                    macro-sociological level of collective pro-  indebtedness by continual giving to the other
                    ductive processes and institutions? Is it, for  (Godbout, 2000).  The wealth produced
                    example, performed between a nurse and a  by care would consist, to be sure, of the
   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287