Page 281 - The ISA Handbook in Contemporary Sociology
P. 281

9781412934633-Chap-17  1/10/09  10:19 AM  Page 252





                   252               THE ISA HANDBOOK IN CONTEMPORARY SOCIOLOGY


                   1983; James, 1989).  A fourth section will  In recent years, a considerable and bur-
                   extend the argument of the second by dis-  geoning literature on emotion work has
                   cussing the situations in which care work  appeared (for a recent survey, see Bolton,
                   becomes exploitation.  This will revolve  2005, as well as Hochschild, 2003: after-
                   around an analysis of necessary and surplus  wards; Rastetter, 1999; Steinberg and Figart,
                   labour in care work.                    1999).  The founding text of this tradition,
                                                           The Managed Heart by Arlie  Hochschild
                                                           (1983), shows how social life is regulated by
                                                           the countless acts of work performed by indi-
                   CARE AND LABOUR                         viduals in order to shape their own and
                                                           others’ emotions within the context of ‘feel-
                   Care is labour in the sense that in pursuit of a  ing rules’. Just as acting in the theatre creates
                   goal it sets in motion natural forces in order  an effect (suspension of disbelief, etc.), so
                   to act upon nature and realize a new objectiv-  emotion work in everyday life is performa-
                   ity (Browne, 1990; Lukács, 1980). A particu-  tive activity that achieves a given effect,
                   larity of care as labour is that the human  shaping subjects’ mutual attitudes and rela-
                   body as a social objectivity is its instrument,  tionships. The effect is a joint production, for
                   its material substrate and its product. This is  feeling is usually a collective activity, bound
                   even more evident in health care, where the  up with the exchange of ‘gestures or signs of
                   purpose of labour is the prevention and cure  feeling with others’: ‘We bow to each other
                   of illness, the realization of wellness.  The  not only from the waist but from the heart.
                   work is inescapably material, dealing as it  Feeling rules set out what is owed in gestures
                   does with dirt, disease and death. This activ-  of exchange between people’ (Hochschild,
                   ity is multidimensional, combining physical,  1983: 76). Hochschild speaks of the ‘pay-
                   intellectual and emotional aspects (James,  ment of latent dues’, but regards this basi-
                   1989, 1992). The multidimensional nature of  cally as an essential part of the gift
                   care is illustrated by the way other languages,  relationship in everyday life: ‘The deeper the
                   such as French and German, require several  bond, the more central and latent the gifts
                   words to convey its various dimensions:  exchanged, and the more often a person com-
                   Liebe, Sorge and Pflege in German; amour,  pensates in one arena for what is lacking in
                   souci and soin in French.               another. One way that such compensations
                     While care work is first and foremost body  are achieved is through the medium of
                   work (Twigg, 2000: 137ff.), it is a specific  emotional gift exchange’ (Hochschild, 1983:
                   form of it. As Susan Himmelweit puts it: ‘the  83–4). 2
                   process of caring is itself the development of a  Emotion work as a joint work of produc-
                   relationship. The care a carer provides is basi-  tion is at the heart of the production of the
                   cally inseparable from the relationship that is  care effect. One could perform a colonoscopy
                   being developed with the person she is caring  on someone in the same way that one investi-
                   for’ (Himmelweit, 1999: 29). Its hallmark is  gated the pipes in a house. But it would
                   co-production by ‘caregivers’ and ‘users’, for  scarcely count as  care.  At the same time,
                   it is a process in which production is not sep-  caring for is not the same as caring about.
                   arate from consumption.  As Julia  Twigg  Care does not necessarily take place within
                   points out: ‘It is in the dynamics of the care  relationships of love or friendship. Indeed,
                   encounter that the nature of what is produced  recipients of care interviewed by Francine
                   is defined; production and consumption col-  Saillant described their professional care-
                   lapse into one another. [...] [U]sers and work-  givers as ‘friends’, but ‘not friends like their
                   ers are co–producers of care’ (Twigg, 2000: 1,  other friends’ (Saillant, 2001). Often, the
                   121; also see Baldock, 1997: 83). Dialogue is  relationship of care brings together strangers
                   an essential dimension of care.         in situations of great intimacy, in which
   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286