Page 284 - The ISA Handbook in Contemporary Sociology
P. 284

9781412934633-Chap-17  1/10/09  10:19 AM  Page 255





                                             SOCIAL DIVISION OF HEALTH CARE                  255


                    the creation of debt in the gift relationship or  constitutive of her’ (Radin, 1996, cited by
                    in kinship may be bound up with asymme-  Himmelweit, 1999: 36). In Marxist terms,
                    tries of power, redistribution and exchange  one could speak of this as objectification and
                    can seem to offer advantages over reciproc-  alienation, understanding that ‘labour’ in
                    ity. State redistribution governed by a   Radin’s usage (or alienation as presented by
                    citizen’s right to public services incurs no  Marx in the  1844 Manuscripts) is an ideal
                    debt. Market purchase of a service liquidates  type, since the separation between work and
                    debt in the very instant that it occurs. This  life, and the instrumentalization of the
                    may offer the greatest freedom to consumers  former, are rarely so absolute. Bolton (2005)
                    with purchasing power and many options  stresses this point as well, criticizing
                    among which to choose (Godbout, 1987).  Hochschild (unfairly, in my view) for having
                    For those who need care, either the state or  too reductionist and pessimistic understand-
                    the market routes may restore balance and  ing of the alienation of emotion work in the
                    some semblance of symmetry to a relation-  modern economy. Bolton argues that workers
                    ship made intolerable by one-sided indebted-  as social actors have much greater latitude
                    ness. The parties to a care relationship must  than Hochschild recognizes in determining
                    constantly maintain a delicate and precarious  the emotional dimensions of the relation-
                    balance, in order to avoid the Scylla of  ships within which they work.
                    oppression and the Charybdis of dependency  The notion of incomplete commodifica-
                    (Gagnon et al., 2000).  A public-sector  tion implies that remunerated service only
                    agency acting as a third party can provide a  truly becomes care within hybrid relations of
                    framework of rules and expectations that   production, in which the logics of exchange
                    provides stability and a measure of protec-  and/or redistribution combine with the logic
                    tion to all involved. The state and market are  of reciprocity. To be sure, in a situation of
                    conducive also to the development of capital-  complete commodification, the worker might
                    intensive curative systems predicated on a  perform the emotional labour required to
                    high volume and intensity of specialized  produce feelings of trust and ease within the
                    activities (e.g., surgeries).           care recipient. But this hardly qualifies as co-
                      Unfortunately, the market and the state  production, as I have defined it here, for the
                    offer no panaceas. One may simply escape  worker’s relationship to the work and to the
                    the frying pan of personal dependency by  person needing care is purely instrumental.
                    falling into the fire of alienation. Himmelweit  In the light of the previous section, of course,
                    (1999) suggests that care ceases to be itself  one might regard ‘full’ and ‘incomplete’
                    and becomes a mere service when it is com-  commodification as different levels of
                    pletely commodified. Following Radin    abstraction, that is, a moment of analysis
                    (1996), she posits a process of ‘incomplete  that strips away layers of complexity to show
                    commodification’ in care, where workers do  the pure workings of the commodity form,
                    not exhaust their effort in the tasks they are  and a moment that more closely represents
                    contracted to perform, but give time beyond  the concrete phenomena.
                    these tasks, out of love for their work and
                    pride in what they do.
                      ‘Work’ contrasts with ‘labour’ in Radin’s
                    and Himmelweit’s usage of those terms.  THE TOTAL SOCIAL ORGANIZATION
                    Labour to them means an activity which is  OF LABOUR IN CANADIAN HEALTH
                    completely commodified and consists only  CARE
                    of the contracted tasks; work differs, because
                    money does not ‘exhaust’ its value and it ‘is  A vast array and diverse range of practices
                    understood not as separate from life and self,  and organizations exist within the total social
                    but rather as part of the worker and indeed  organization of care work. What appeared in
   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289