Page 338 - The ISA Handbook in Contemporary Sociology
P. 338

9781412934633-Chap-21  1/10/09  8:54 AM  Page 309





                                              CRIME IN RURAL COMMUNITIES                     309


                    important implications for criminological  of actors communicate, solve problems and
                    theory in general and certainly for the  conduct their daily lives (Liepins, 2000).
                    advancement of a rural criminology.     Hence, community forms the starting point
                    Unfortunately, no one really knows. A few  for the development of a comparative frame-
                    studies from other nations have been pub-  work in which to understand rural crime, and
                    lished recently, but they hardly fill the  to assist in the continued diffusion of rural
                    tremendous need that exists, given the large  crime research to a diversity of settings.
                    rural populations of so many of these coun-  There are three common features of rural
                    tries and the rapidity of global-based change  communities (and their populations) which
                    (Erulkar, 2004; Fafchamps and Moser, 2003;  justify the need for a specialized sub-field
                    Jobes, 1999b; Koenig et al., 2003; Jain et al.,  within criminology. Rural communities, by
                    2004; Krishnan, 2005; Panda and Agarwal,  definition, have smaller populations and
                    2005). Furthermore, some aspects of rural  lower population densities. Patterns of daily
                    crime are trans-national in scope. Drug pro-  living are comparatively more limited than in
                    duction and trafficking is one example. The  urban communities, and involve a greater
                    other is human trafficking.             share of persistent personal face-to-face
                      The second problem is that rural criminol-  interactions among people who know each
                    ogy has yet to develop viable conceptual  other. Finally, rural communities are today
                    frameworks that allow scholars to synthesize  rapidly losing their isolation and autonomy
                    current scholarship effectively and advance  to the forces of globalization. Compared to
                    theory and research beyond the borders of a  the past, nearly all rural places around the
                    single country, especially the USA.  The  world are influenced to some extent, and
                    remainder of this chapter proposes the begin-  many to a great extent, by external cultural,
                    ning steps of a solution to both problems.  economic and social forces. Proximity to
                                                            cities, industries with absentee ownership,
                                                            tourism and development policies of nation-
                                                            states are just a few of the factors that influ-
                    COMMUNITY AND RURAL CRIME               ence the loss of autonomy of rural places
                                                            today. In turn, these factors must be accounted
                    C. Wright Mills (1959) stated a basic socio-  for in conceptual frameworks designed to
                    logical relationship between macro-level  improve the theoretical sophistication of
                    change, which he called ‘public issues’, and  rural crime research. Issues interrelated with
                    the situation of individuals at the micro-level,  crime, such as power, dominance, gender and
                    which he termed ‘personal troubles’. Without  discrimination, further exacerbate external
                    knowledge of the context of broad structural-  processes shaping the dynamics and the
                    level conditions and change, little could be  attributes within and between rural commu-
                    understood about individual behaviours,  nities throughout the world.
                    including criminality. It is context that  Despite commonalities, as well as the
                    counts, and whether criminology research  diversity, of rural places, why use the concept
                    utilizes quantitative or qualitative data, there  of community as a starting point for the
                    is a need for conceptual frameworks that   advance of theory in rural criminology? The
                    recognize the situated context of crime  answer lies in the central roles of community
                    (Kitsuse and Spector, 1973). Definitions of  in the formation of behaviour and attitudes
                    crime are indicators of the norms, mores   (Oetting et al., 1988). As already mentioned,
                    and ideologies of groups who compete for  community is a concept capable of linking
                    power and influence within various societies  ‘personal troubles’ and ‘public issues’. The
                    (Greenberg, 1981).                      structural level study of crime, much
                      Most definitions of community agree that  of which emerged from the Chicago School
                    it is a geographical place in which networks  of sociology and continues in the work of
   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343