Page 334 - The ISA Handbook in Contemporary Sociology
P. 334

9781412934633-Chap-21  1/10/09  8:54 AM  Page 305









                                                                                    21








                           Sociological Theory, Social


                        Change, and Crime in Rural


                                                           Communities




                                Joseph F. Donnermeyer, Pat Jobes and Elaine Barclay








                    INTRODUCTION                            have remained relatively unstudied in the
                                                            field of criminology, despite their global recon-
                    This chapter presents ‘community’ as a key  figuration. Finally, crime in the rural context
                    concept from which to develop a compara-  suffers from two mutually reinforcing myths.
                    tive approach to the examination of crime  The first is that rural crime rates are always
                    among rural people and rural communities.  much lower than urban rates when comparing
                    Community is treated as a sociological  data from similar kinds of social units, such as
                    framework that can relate individual behav-  state/provincial or county/county-equivalent
                    iour, underlying economic and social struc-  level areas. Hence, stating the myth, rural
                    tural characteristics, social meanings and the  crime research is neither necessary nor impor-
                    various demographic and ecological dimen-  tant to the scientific advance of criminology.
                    sions of social phenomena that are relevant to  The second is that rural places display less het-
                    the examination of crime in the rural context  erogeneity than urban places. Therefore, since
                    (Liepins, 2000). A community approach rec-  rural communities are mostly alike and the
                    ognizes the unique characteristics of rural  data says urban rates are generally higher, by
                    social structure and rural cultures, but avoids  extrapolation, all rural places display lower
                    a single template for rural settings, recogniz-  crime and exhibit less interesting criminologi-
                    ing instead that specific rural places are each  cal phenomena to study (Donnermeyer and
                    affected by historical, cultural, social, eco-  Jobes, 2000).
                    nomic and geographical components.
                      We emphasize rural for three reasons.
                    Conceptually, rural communities across the
                    globe share sufficient similarities to be con-  THE EVOLUTION OF RURAL CRIME
                    sidered a common phenomenon despite     SCHOLARSHIP
                    enormous cross-national and cross-cultural
                    differences. Scientifically, rural community  Tönnies (1957) utilized his now famous
                    characteristics and their relationship to crime  Gemeinschaft–Gesellschaft dichotomy to
   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339