Page 381 - The ISA Handbook in Contemporary Sociology
P. 381

9781412934633-Chap-24  1/10/09  8:55 AM  Page 352





                   352               THE ISA HANDBOOK IN CONTEMPORARY SOCIOLOGY


                   observations (Auyero, 2003). Cultural ele-  which individuals frame their worldview, we
                   ments, which are by definition highly com-  get much more than information on their
                   plex and socially situated (i.e., they are  intentions, interests, actions, and environ-
                   rooted in history and subjectively actualized  ment. As we will see, certain regularities in
                   in everyday life), add to the ‘magma of  their discourse reveal the presence of cogni-
                   empirical components’ that makes every  tive structures that have been internalized.
                   social movement unique. How can we then  This paper’s goal is to analyze relevant data
                   associate  particular cultural understandings  about current social mobilization in Latin
                   with general effects?                   America and also to show the heuristic
                     We have first to consider the objective  potential of this particular approach.
                   transnationalization of social activism along  While there is ample evidence of the trans-
                   the lines of an emerging ‘masterframe’ of  formation of movement activity since the
                   ‘global social justice’ (Della Porta and  1970s, McAdam, Sampson,  Weffer, and
                   Tarrow, 2005: 12). This has led both to an   MacIndoe point out that almost all of the
                   ideological convergence among social move-  work on changes in social mobilization has
                   ments and to extended chains of argumenta-  been ‘speculative in nature’ (2005: 5). This
                   tion, that is, discursive linkages between  gap must be filled with more ‘event
                   local conditions as directly experienced by  research’, as these authors suggest, and also
                   actors and more general issues.  This, of  with more and better ‘discourse analysis’.
                   course, is not a new phenomenon: a common  We contend that the systematic analysis of
                   Marxist masterframe allowed activists in  discursive patterns can help to unveil social
                   very different cultural contexts to link every-  representations in a way that quantitative
                   day injustices to the wider – and more  polls and qualitative in-depth case studies
                   abstract – issues of ‘class struggle’ and ‘the  cannot (Abric, 2003). People freely and
                   proletariat’s historic mission’. However, we  spontaneously create unique narratives to
                   need to point out an important difference: the  make sense of their world, but they do so by
                   emerging masterframe, as opposed to the  referring to a limited and socially determined
                   sternly universalist and positivist Marxist  set of available cognitive and normative
                   one, actually puts cultural particularism –  on a  frames (Snow and Benford, 1992). Much
                   national, ethnic, group, and even personal level  more empirical research is still needed in
                   –  at the centre of people’s narratives. In brief,  order to gain a better understanding of the
                   we see a global call to assert local identities.  mechanisms through which the individual
                     But that is only part of the whole picture.  and the collective coalesce in social mobi-
                   It is obviously true that the ‘local’ argument  lization. By ‘treating individual statements as
                   has acquired social and political legitimacy,  texts’ (Hawkesworth, 2003: 533) and, partic-
                   that movement leaders meet and develop a  ularly, through the observation of recurrent
                   common vocabulary at international forums,  word choices and their articulation in con-
                   and that organized civil society tends to  ceptual networks, we can explore ‘the way a
                   adopt the anti-globalization and human  given structural situation is defined and expe-
                   rights rhetoric. However this simplistic per-  rienced and the meanings that will be
                   spective (‘activists talk the activist talk’)  attached to actions’ (Oliver et al., 2003: 12).
                   does not suffice and should be comple-
                   mented by a sociological analysis of social
                   representations. As Pierre Bourdieu, building
                   on Émile Durkheim’s theory of social repre-  SOCIAL MOBILIZATION IN EL
                   sentations, points out, the social order is  SALVADOR AND HONDURAS
                   maintained through the correspondence of
                   ‘objective and mental structures’ (Bourdieu,  Several new movements have emerged in
                   1994). By methodically observing the way in  Latin America during the past decade, ranging
   376   377   378   379   380   381   382   383   384   385   386