Page 382 - The ISA Handbook in Contemporary Sociology
P. 382

9781412934633-Chap-24  1/10/09  8:55 AM  Page 353





                                             SOCIAL JUSTICE IN LATIN AMERICA                 353


                    from the Zapatistas in Mexico to the landless  interests appear to be less clear or direct
                    rural workers in Brazil. While each of these  (Jordan, 2002). Some protest movements
                    movements has particular features, it is nev-  seem to reach a critical mass through the
                    ertheless possible to observe a number of  spontaneous aggregation of actors in the
                    common traits, as well as a clear-cut contrast  streets and public spaces (which fits to a cer-
                    between them and the insurgent or resistance  tain extent the category of ‘mass behaviour’),
                    movements of the Cold War era. The case of  with no leaders, no organization, or a highly
                    Argentina’s  Piqueteros –  picketers who  decentralized one, and with no specific polit-
                    block highways and bridges –  is particularly  ical aim. However, they have shown a sur-
                    telling.  They form a movement of mostly  prising level of cohesion in terms of the
                    urban unemployed and impoverished men   actors’ stated motives, and they have given
                    and women who sometimes resort to civil  rise to some innovative types of coordination
                    disobedience tactics in order to capture   and cooperation. These features reveal both a
                    the attention of the government, the mass  strong subjective component and a shared
                    media, and public opinion. But their funda-  representation of the issues at stake. These
                    mental drive is to achieve autonomy and self-  become apparent in the actors’ discourse.
                    organization (Armony, 2004).  These new   Interestingly, this transformation of social
                    social movements are more focused on ethical  mobilization in Latin  America seems to
                    issues and operate within the parameters of  follow trends that can be observed in North
                    what Maria da Glória Gohn (2000: 36–7)  America. In an empirical study of the chang-
                    calls an ‘individual citizenship’, linked to the  ing nature of movement activity in Chicago
                    notion of ‘social rights’ –  particularly  over a 30-year period, McAdam,  Sampson,
                    through the idea of social ‘services’ –  and   Weffer, and MacIndoe argue that ‘If socio-
                    to the actors’ subjective experience.  As  economic disadvantage increased the likeli-
                    Boaventura de Sousa Santos puts it, ‘the  hood of protest in 1970, the reverse is true
                    emancipation that they fight for is one that  today’ (2005: 15). Using data on some 4,000
                    aims at transforming [their] everyday life [...]  collective civic events and public protests
                    here and now and not in a distant future’  between 1970 and 2000, they show that the
                    (2001: 178).                            recent period is characterized by more rou-
                      The surge of citizen mobilization in Latin  tinized, less disruptive forms of demands.
                    America has led to a renewed interest in the  Their research also suggests that the issues
                    symbolic dimension of social protest and the  motivating public protest activity have grown
                    subjective aspects of social activism.  more local over time. The data collected by
                    Although resource mobilization theory   McAdam, Sampson, Weffer, and MacIndoe
                    (McAdam et al., 2001) is quite helpful in  ‘lends empirical weight to those who have
                    regard to the understanding of how social  theorized about the “institutionalization” of
                    movements rise, develop, and succeed    protest and the rise of a “movement society”
                    (or fail), its focus on organization, strategy,  in the US’ (2005: 16). While the differences
                    and outcomes tends to exclude the systematic  between North America and Latin America
                    study of discourse. Protest movements that  are still obviously significant, it is interesting
                    have been emerging in Latin America since  to note that on both continents social mobi-
                    the mid-1990s defy conventional wisdom  lization seems to be associated with a quest
                    about social mobilization. They show many  for rights and recognition that is framed
                    features that are usually found in the so-  in more local and individual terms, and not
                    called New Social Movements (Della Porta  necessarily or uniquely related to economic
                    and Diani, 1999), but they also display some  claims (Auyero, 2003). Most current mobi-
                    very distinctive traits. For example, the rela-  lization in Latin America conveys a demand
                    tionships between reason and emotion or  for inclusion in the political and economic
                    between material conditions and subjective  system, rather than for its revolutionary
   377   378   379   380   381   382   383   384   385   386   387