Page 421 - The ISA Handbook in Contemporary Sociology
P. 421

9781412934633-Chap-26  1/10/09  8:57 AM  Page 392





                   392               THE ISA HANDBOOK IN CONTEMPORARY SOCIOLOGY


                   cooperation of the respective national   costs (in terms of land rents and labour
                   governments.                            wages) but Singapore-standard industrial
                     By 2005, it could be argued that the  infrastructure and administration. Also, this
                   Singapore government’s regionalization  project had the strong support of two national
                   strategy had generally turned out to be rela-  governments, which gave investors a sense of
                   tively successful for most of the parties con-  long-term stability.
                   cerned, despite a few setbacks which will be  However, conflicts between the two gov-
                   discussed in the next section.  The main   ernments began to emerge soon after 1997.
                   beneficiaries have been the transnational cor-  This was in part due to the onset of the Asian
                   porations, who have been able to ‘disaggre-  Financial Crisis. Even though the Crisis did
                   gate’their operations much more conveniently  not affect China, it had the impact of signifi-
                   and effectively, thanks to the cooperation  cantly reducing FDI in the whole region as
                   between Singapore and the host govern-  global consumer demand meant that transna-
                   ments. The local host governments too have  tional corporations were more cautious about
                   been fairly satisfied, as the parks have   investing in new factories around the world
                   been able to generate employment and other  (see Haggard and Low, 2002). With this decline
                   developmental effects.  Although the    in the supply of FDI, the inter-governmental
                   Singapore government has reported that  competition in the whole Asia-Pacific region
                   these regional industrial parks have not made  intensified. Indeed, in some cases, even sub-
                   any financial profits, the strategy is still   national governments competed against
                   considered crucial to Singapore’s own   national governments. This was the case in
                   domestic industrial restructuring process as,  the Suzhou Industrial Park, as it saw direct
                   since the late 1990s, Singaporean small and  competition for FDI from the neighbouring
                   medium enterprises have also been shifting  Suzhou New District, an industrial estate
                   lower value added operations to these parks  administered by the Suzhou Municipal
                   (see Chia, 2000).                       Authority.  The Suzhou New District mod-
                                                           elled itself on the Singapore-developed
                                                           Suzhou Industrial Park. It claimed to offer
                                                           Singapore-standard industrial infrastructure
                   Conflict
                                                           and administration as it had learnt by
                   As mentioned in the previous section, the  ‘observing’. More significantly, it could offer
                   regional industrial parks were generally suc-  even lower land rents than the Singapore-
                   cessful in achieving the original target, which  developed Suzhou Industrial Park (see
                   was inter-state cooperation to jointly attract  Pereira, 2003).
                   FDI. However, there was one case where    The competition for FDI by the Suzhou
                   there was obvious inter-government conflict:  New District strained the Singapore–China
                   the Suzhou Industrial Park project, which  inter-governmental cooperation. Between
                   was a collaborative project between the  1998 and 1999, the Singapore government
                   Singapore and China governments.  This  asked the Chinese government to discipline
                   project was located 60 kilometres west of  the Suzhou Municipal Authority, proposing
                   Shanghai, just outside Suzhou city. From the  that any new FDI would go to the locally run
                   Singapore government’s perspective, it was  Suzhou New District only after the other
                   the largest of its regional industrial parks, in  project was ‘fully filled’. Much to the frustra-
                   terms of geographical size as well as finan-  tion of the Singapore government, the
                   cial outlay (see Pereira, 2003). Between 1994  central China government in Beijing chose
                   and 1997, the Suzhou Industrial Park was  not to take any action to ‘discipline’ the sub-
                   one of the fastest growing FDI zones in the  national government. The Suzhou Municipal
                   whole of Asia, as multinational and transna-  Authority remained defiant: it claimed that
                   tional corporations saw that it had China-level  there should be ‘free and fair’ competition
   416   417   418   419   420   421   422   423   424   425   426