Page 60 - The ISA Handbook in Contemporary Sociology
P. 60

9781412934633-Chap-03  1/10/09  8:41 AM  Page 31





                                         SECURE, GENDERED POLITICS OF BELONGING               31


                    These boundaries and borders can be con-  1999) I have followed a wider definition of
                    tested not only between those who are inter-  the concept. Using T. H. Marshall’s definition
                    nal or external to them, but also between  of citizenship (1950, 1975) as ‘full member-
                    people who see themselves, and are seen, as  ship of the community with rights and
                    belonging to the same collectivity, or even by  responsibilities’, I have argued that the con-
                    the same people at different times and in dif-  cept can also be used in relation to other poli-
                    ferent situations because of their different  ties than the ‘nation-state’, to the extent that
                    social locations and different social values.  membership in other collectivities endows
                    The contested and shifting nature of these  citizens with rights and obligations in a similar
                    boundaries and borders may reflect not only  manner.
                    dynamic power relations between individu-  Historically, citizenship emerged as active
                    als, collectivities, and institutions but also  participation in political communities that
                    subjective and situational processes.   evolved in cities (the Greek polis) and then
                      One of the crucial intervening factors in  developed as a legal status in empires (such
                    these dynamics is the fact that people tend to  as the Roman Empire). Jean Cohen (1999)
                    belong – in different ways and with different  argues that in the nation-state these two ele-
                    intensities – to more than one collectivity and  ments of citizenship have come together.
                    polity. Local, ethnic, national, inter- and  However, as Yasemin Soysal (1994), David
                    supra-national political communities are   Held (1995), and others have argued, new
                    just some of the ‘imagined communities’  trans-national and supra-national forms of
                    (Anderson, 1991 [1983]) with which people  citizenship are developing, forms that Bryan
                    may identify, in which they are active, at  Turner has called (1998) post-Fordist citizen-
                    least to a certain degree, and to which they  ship.  As I have argued elsewhere (1999),
                    may feel a certain sense of attachment. One  international legislation on human rights can
                    level of exploration, following Anne-Marie  be seen, from such a perspective, as just
                    Fortier (2000), is that of the ways in which  another layer of citizenship.  At the same
                    common histories, experiences, and places  time, I have also pointed out that in terms of
                    are created, imagined, and sustained in what  affecting personal lives and constructing
                    Vikki Bell (1999) calls ‘the performativity of  rights and obligations, sub-national and
                    belonging’. Another level, however (although  cross-national communities can also become
                    interwoven with the first), is the examination  bearers of significant citizenships, in specific
                    of the hierarchy and dynamics of power that  local, religious, and ethnic contexts.
                    are exercised between these collectivities and  As mentioned above, however, the notion
                    the degree of cooperation or conflict between  of citizenship needs to be differentiated from
                    them. In other words, the relationship  that of belonging, which encompasses not
                    between the society and the polity is crucial  only the participatory dimension of citizen-
                    to the understanding of the multi-layered and  ship but also the cognitive and emotional
                    multiplex constructions of belongings of  dimensions of identification and attachment
                    both individuals and groupings.         (Yuval-Davis, 2006a). Identities are the indi-
                      Following a terminology first used by  vidual and collective narratives people tell
                    Michael  Walzer (1997), Crowley argues  themselves and others about who they are
                    (1999: 22) that the idea of ‘belonging’ is an  and who they are not. However, belonging is
                    attempt to give a ‘thicker’ account of the  not only about cognitions and perceptions.
                    political and social dynamics of integration  Feeling that one is (or is not) part of a
                    in relation to the concept of citizenship,  collectivity, a community, a social category,
                    which he defines as formal membership in a  or  yearning to be so, is central to a sense of
                    nation-state.                           belonging, and is not the same as actually
                      In my own work on citizenship (1994,  taking part (or not) in a political community
                    1997a, 1999;  Yuval-Davis and  Werbner,  with all the rights and responsibilities involved.
   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65