Page 64 - The ISA Handbook in Contemporary Sociology
P. 64

9781412934633-Chap-03  1/10/09  8:41 AM  Page 35





                                         SECURE, GENDERED POLITICS OF BELONGING               35


                    many millions of ‘people on the move’ glob-  The original design of the UN members who
                    ally – documented and especially undocu-  passed the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
                                                             in 1948 was to consolidate the rights listed in the
                    mented migrants as well as internally
                                                             declaration in a single treaty encompassing civil,
                    displaced people – who have any formal   political, economic, social and cultural rights. USA
                    legal rights at all. The others become what  lobbying resulted in the division of the covenant
                    Giorgio Agamben (1997) has called, follow-  into two: an International Covenant on Civil and
                    ing Hanna Arendt (1943), ‘bare lives’, easy  Political Rights and one on Economic, Social and
                                                             Cultural Rights (16 December 1966). From that
                    prey to extreme forms of exploitation and
                                                             time onwards, the official USA position has been
                    abuse. Furthermore, more and more states  to relegate the latter rights to a lower status and
                    are now engaged in constructing ‘extra-ter-  view them as something to be ‘achieved progres-
                                 2
                    restrial spaces’, such as Guantanamo Bay  sively’ rather than implemented immediately’.
                    and off-shore detention camps for asylum  (Herman, 2002: xiii)
                    seekers, in which the states attempt to   Therefore, during the Cold  War, democ-
                    construct spaces where neither national nor  racy and human rights became the banner, in
                    international laws apply.               different ways, of both sides of the conflict.
                                                            The West placed more emphasis on the lib-
                                                            eral civil and political rights, while the Soviet
                                                            bloc presented itself as the friend of the
                    ‘SECURITY’, ‘HUMAN SECURITY’, AND       developing world, with industrialization and
                    THE POLITICS OF BELONGING               economic development as their priorities.
                                                            The development of international aid can be
                    Terrorists or Al-Quaida people, on the one  seen as one historical manifestation of the
                    hand, and asylum seekers from poor      competition between the two blocs in the
                    Southern countries, on the other hand, are  Third World and the open door to refugees
                    perceived, then, as major threats to Western  in  Western countries (who were then seen
                    states. The latter are seeking, in a variety of  mainly as escaping from communist regimes)
                    ways to contain them and keep them outside  has also been a direct effect of this.
                    their national borders, so as to keep their   Since the end of the Cold War, which has
                    own citizens ‘secure’. As I mentioned at the  been accompanied by the exacerbation of
                    beginning of the article, ‘security’ and  local ethnic and national conflicts, there has
                    belonging are perceived to be closely related:  been a massive increase of human rights dis-
                    Michael Ignatief, while Head of the Centre  course and legislation – partly as a replace-
                    for Human Rights at Harvard University,  ment for socialist discourse which had been
                    argued that belonging is about ‘feeling safe’  delegitimized.  Another contributing factor
                    (2001).                                 was the vision which, for a few years, offered
                      The development of international human  the illusion that the world was progressing
                    rights discourse and legislation since the end  towards a unified global democracy.  This
                    of  World  War II can be interpreted as one  vision was aided by a series of UN confer-
                    way of ensuring that people will have the  ences with growing NGO participation, start-
                    right to feel secure, with their basic rights  ing with the 1994 conference in Vienna on
                    respected wherever they are in the world. The  human rights. At this time cosmopolitan dis-
                    Nazi experience made it evident that national  course became more dominant again (e.g.
                    governments cannot be given a monopoly of  Held, 1995; Kaldor, 2003; Pollock et al.,
                    guardianship of the rights of the people,  2002) and the discourse on ‘human security’
                    whether citizens or non-citizens, living under  became a complementary (and for some a
                    their rule. The UN Human Rights declaration  substitute) discourse to that of ‘human
                    aimed to create an end to ‘bare life’situations  rights’.
                    as a basic mission of the UN, international  I have no space here to summarize in detail
                    relations and law.                      the debates about human security (see, for
   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69