Page 65 - The ISA Handbook in Contemporary Sociology
P. 65

9781412934633-Chap-03  1/10/09  8:41 AM  Page 36





                   36                THE ISA HANDBOOK IN CONTEMPORARY SOCIOLOGY


                   example, Alkire, 2002; Basch et al., 1994;  military operations. Generally in the post
                   Yuval-Davis, 2005). For many in NGOs and  Cold War period there has been a growing
                   development organizations, human security  move in security concerns from inter-state to
                   discourse served as an attempt to overcome  intra-state ones, and from national territories
                   some of the perceived shortcomings of   to ethnicized and racialized communities,
                   human rights discourse, especially its liberal  local and trans-national. Moreover, the grow-
                   version, which excluded economic and social  ing use of long-distance guided missiles
                   rights. It was closely linked to Amartya Sen’s  which are targeted at specific people, and the
                   (1992, 2000) ‘capabilities approach’ to  global hunting of particular terrorists, has
                   development.  This approach rejects the   greatly exacerbated this tendency.
                   discourse of rights and entitlements as well  It is in this way that ‘human security’ has
                   as of general measures of opulence, such as  been transformed from a cosmopolitan dis-
                   GNP per capita, and instead focuses on how  course of inclusion into a global discourse of
                   people positioned in all groups in society are  exclusion and fear, from a complement of
                   capable of achieving quality of life in terms  human rights to its antithesis.  This can be
                   of achievement and freedom. It argues that  illustrated in the various ways ministers in
                   resources have no value in themselves apart  Tony Blair’s Labour government in the UK,
                   from their role in promoting human function-  including the Prime Minister himself, have
                   ing.  This interpretation of human security  publicly regretted the incorporation of the
                   was the dominant one in the Human Security  Human Rights Act into British legislation as
                   Commission, which acted as a consultative  blocking an efficient treatment of people
                   body to UN Secretary-General, Kofi Annan.  who are perceived to be security threats.
                   This was how human security came to be  Ironically, its passage had been one of that
                   incorporated into his Millennium Report.  government’s first acts when it originally
                     The  Report of the Human Security     came to power in 1997.
                   Commission, when it finally came out in 2003,
                   argued in its introduction that:
                     Human security complements state security, fur-
                     thers human development, and enhances human  THE GENDERED PARADOXES OF
                     rights. It complements state security by being  SECURE BELONGINGS
                     people-centered and addressing insecurities that
                     have not been considered as state security threats.  The security discourse is closely related to
                     By looking at ‘downside risks’, it broadens the
                     human development focus beyond ‘growth with  nationalist politics of belonging. As Anderson
                     equity’. Respecting human rights is at the core of  (1991 [1983]; see also Kitching, 1985)
                     protecting human security (UN Human Security  pointed out, there are very few causes for
                     Commission, 2003: 3).                 which people – traditionally men – are ready
                     However, as Basch and Timothy argue in  to sacrifice their lives as well as to kill, one
                   their articles in the special issue of  Peace  being the cause of their imagined communi-
                   Review on human security they edited in  ties of belonging. Paradoxically, in the name
                   2004, by the time the Report came out, the  of communal security, real and/or imagined,
                   subversive use of the notion of ‘security’  they are prepared to sacrifice their personal
                   which had made it so popular among human  security; for the ‘right of self-determination’,
                   rights and peace activists, had lost much of  they are prepared to sacrifice their right to
                   its flavour, as a result of the shift in discourse  live; and for the sake of ‘peace’, they go
                   on security after 9/11. In the context of the  to war. With the shift from national drafts to
                   ‘global war on terror’, the changing patterns  professional militaries, however, men – and
                   of warfare, and the growing securitization of  more and more women – are prepared to
                   borders and boundaries, the notion of human  do all this for the security of professional
                   security reflects the growing individuation of  military careers and – as the American and
   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70