Page 75 - The ISA Handbook in Contemporary Sociology
P. 75

9781412934633-Chap-04  1/10/09  8:41 AM  Page 46





                   46                THE ISA HANDBOOK IN CONTEMPORARY SOCIOLOGY


                   3 Sociology has no institutionalized tradition for  In 1991, Jan M. Fritz defined ‘clinical soci-
                      offering advice and consultancy.     ology’ as:
                   4 Sociological associations have no tradition of
                      generating diagnostics and guidelines for social  the creation of new systems as well as the inter-
                      intervention.                         vention in existing systems for purposes of assess-
                                                            ment and/or change. Clinical sociologists are
                                                            humanistic scientists who are multidisciplinary
                     A paradox of sociology is that, on the one  in approach. They engage in planned social
                   hand, most students have little ambition to  change efforts by focusing on one system level
                                                            (e.g., interpersonal, community, international) but
                   pursue careers in scientific research, while,
                                                            integrate levels of focus in their work and do so from
                   on the other hand, the applied branches of the  a sociological frame of reference (Fritz, 1991: 18).
                   discipline were never firmly established.
                   Psychology, for example, did much better in  The distinction between clinical sociology
                   this respect.                           and sociological practice was not that clear.
                     Two explanations have been advanced   The term clinical sociology was first used in
                   (Jacobs, 2004). One explanation is that the  the 1920s to label a kind of practical medical
                   association of the label ‘sociology’ with left  sociology (Fritz, 1991: 18) and though the
                   wing politics may have hindered the accept-  concept was soon used outside the medical
                   ance of the field of ‘applied sociology’. The  domain, it still bears connotations linked to
                   reality is, however, that concepts and meth-  the concept of social pathology. It is cur-
                   ods that originate in sociology did see a wide  rently used as a label for sociological inter-
                   application. One example is the use of focus  vention in social problems, conflicts and
                   groups in market research. The second expla-  interaction on a personal level. Examples of
                   nation is that members of academic sociology  such interventions are work with delinquent
                   departments were, for a long time, preoccupied  youths (Bility, 1999), victims of sexual abuse
                   with establishing the scientific respectability  (Disch, 2001), self-help groups (Williams,
                   of their discipline, and were not very inter-  2000), as well as work related to family inter-
                   ested in applying sociological insights to,   action and conflict mediation on an individ-
                   for example, business or administrative prob-  ual and even on a national level (Fritz, 2002).
                   lems. Instead, this tended to become the  The broader term ‘Sociological Practice’
                   province of applied disciplines such as busi-  is used for sociological support to social
                   ness studies and public administration.  development at an organizational, local and
                     Nevertheless, sociological practitioners  national level.
                   have a lot to offer. They bring a strong sensi-
                   tivity to social context.  They are versed in
                   both quantitative and qualitative methods and
                   can use a variety of theoretical frameworks to  GOVERNMENTALITY OF
                   approach practical problems from different  SOCIOTECHNICS
                   angles.  And, when drawing on the ethno-
                   graphic tradition, they have access to subtle,  Sociotechnics can be seen as part of a wider
                   often taken-for-granted, micro-processes that  conceptual field of social intervention. This
                   are frequently overlooked but can have  field can be captured by the term ‘govern-
                   macro-consequences (Jacobs, 2004).      mentality’. Foucault (1978) coined this term
                     By establishing a link between sociotech-  to denote a new form of government, the
                   nics, clinical sociology and sociological prac-  origin of which he dated in the eighteenth
                   tice, the Research Committee became the  century.  This new form of government
                   host of intensive discussions linking practical  involves ‘the continual definition and redefi-
                   sociological interventions at micro, meso and  nition of what is within the competence of
                   macro levels to the continued development of  the state and what is not’ (Foucault, 1978:
                   sociological concepts and theories.     103). In other words, governmentality means
   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80