Page 199 -
P. 199

8.18                       CHAPTER EIGHT

         plied. After the water level in the filter has been lowered to the top of the washwater col-
         lection trough,  the  wash  starts.  It usually  lasts  from  3 to  15  min.  A  low-rate water wash
         is  used  at  the  end  of  the  wash  cycle  in  multimedia  filter  beds  to  restratify  the  filter
         media.
           Upflow Water Wash with Air Scour.  Three variations of air and water wash were dis-
         cussed  previously.  The  first--air  scour alone followed by  low-rate water  wash--is  com-
         monly applied in Great Britain to single-medium sand filters with 0.6-  to  1.2-mm ES me-
         dia.  After the  water level in the filter is lowered to below the washwater  overflow, air is
         injected  at  1 to  2  ft3/min/ft 2 (0.3  to  0.6  m3/min/m 2) for  3  to  5  min.  Water  wash  of 5  to
         7.5  gpm/ft 2 (12 to  18 m/h) follows. Bed expansion  and  stratification are not achieved, al-
         though relatively cool water temperatures  may result in fluidizing upper sand layers. Prob-
         lems  with gravel disruption  have not been  experienced if air and  water are  applied sepa-
         rately  (Cleasby  et al.,  1977).
           Air scour alone followed by high-rate water wash can be applied to dual-media or mul-
         timedia filters, because bed stratification occurs during water wash.  This method has been
         used  in the  United  States  with  air  scour  at  2  to  5  ft3/min/ft 2 (0.6  to  1.5  m3/min/m 2) fol-
         lowed by high-rate  water  wash  at  15 to  23  gpm/ft 2 (37  to 56  m/h).
           Concurrent air scour and  water wash  are generally limited to the deep, coarse-grained
         filters common  in Europe.  For  1- to  2-mm ES  media,  air scour rates  of 2 to 4 ft3/min/ft 2
         (0.6  to  1.2  m3/min/m 2)  are  used  with  a  water  flow of 6.3  gprn/ft 2 (15.4  m/h).  For  2-  to
         6-mm ES  media, 6 to  8 ft3/min/ft 2 (1.8  to 2.4 m3/min/m 2) and 6.3  to 7.5  gprn/ft 2 (15.4 to
         18.3  m/h)  are used.  Concurrent  air and  water wash  typically lasts  5  to  10 min and  is fol-
         lowed by  water wash  alone  for another  5  to  10  rain.  The rate of final water  wash is gen-
         erally  1 to  2  times that  used  with  air scour.  In some installations,  concurrent  air and  wa-
         ter wash  is used to improve transport  of solids to the washwater  collection troughs rather
         than  to  increase  scour in  the bed  (Harris,  1970).
           Upflow  Water Wash with Surface  Wash.   Combined  surface  and  water  wash usually
         involves three  phases.  After the  water  surface  level is  lowered  in  the  bed,  surface  wash
         is  activated  and  operated  alone  for  1 to  3  min.  Low-rate  water  wash  is  then  applied  si-
         multaneously for an additional period of roughly 5 to  10 min. Termination of surface wash
         precedes  a  final phase  (1  to 5  min)  during  which  a  higher washwater  rate  is used  to ex-
         pand  the bed 20%  to 50%.  This usually requires a washwater  rate of 15 to 23 gpm/ft 2 (37
         to 56  m/h).  Washwater  flow during  surface agitation is usually  limited to that required to
         expand the bed only slightly. If anthracite  makes  up the top filtering layer, bed expansion
         above  the  surface-wash  system  may  be  desirable  to reduce  the  likelihood  of media loss.
         Rotary surface-wash  systems typically add 0.5 to 0.7 gpm/ft 2 (1.2 to  1.8 m/h) to the wash-
         water  flow.  Fixed-nozzle systems  typically deliver 2  to 4  gpm/ft 2 (5  to  10 m/h).


         Filter Arrangements

         Filters can  be configured  in a  number  of ways  in the overall plant  layout.  It is important
         to develop a layout that is the least costly and is operationally optimized (Begin and Monk,
         1975).  Amirtharajah  (1982)  shows  how  a  minimum-cost  filter design  is obtained  by  dif-
         ferentiating  the cost function  in terms  of length-to-width ratio  as  a  variable.

         Configuration  of Filters.  Filters  are  normally  placed  next  to one  another  along one  or
         both  sides  of a  pipe  gallery.  This  approach  provides  the  most  compact  arrangement  and
         also  simplifies  filter operation  and  maintenance.  If possible,  areas  for  future  expansion
         should  be  provided  at  one  end  of the  row  (or  rows)  of filters,  and  piping  in the  gallery
         should  be installed  with blind flanges  at the  ends  to make future  filter additions  easier.
   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204