Page 226 -
P. 226

9.2                        CHAPTER NINE

           With  establishment  of the  Stage  1 Disinfectants/Disinfection By-product Rule, filtra-
         tion  of  surface  water  must  achieve  specified  reductions  in  total  organic  content  (TOC)
         and/or  reductions  in  disinfection  by-product  levels  [total  trihalamethanes  (TTHM)  and
         sum  of five haloacetic  acids  (HAA5)].  The  Interim  Enhanced  Surface  Water  Treatment
         Rule  calls  for  lower  drinking  water  turbidity.  This  means  that  use  of  slow  sand  and
         DE filters may be limited further without the use of supplemental  measures  or additional
         treatment.



         SLOW SAND FILTRATION
         Slow sand  filtration was  the first type of porous  media filtration used  in water treatment.
         The  first recorded  installations  occurred  in Scotland  and  England  in the early  1800s.  By
         the  mid-1800s,  legislation was  passed  in  London,  England,  requiring  filtration of water
         to  be  consumed.  The  first  recorded  installation  of  slow  sand  filtration  facilities  in  the
         United States was in Poughkeepsie, New York, in  1872.  Subsequent development of rapid
         rate filtration then slowed the pace of construction of slow sand plants in the United States
         in the early  1900s.
           Around  1980,  interest  in  using  slow  sand  filtration  was  rekindled  as  the  U.S.  Envi-
         ronmental  Protection  Agency (USEPA) conducted  research  to develop treatment options
         that are simple to operate for use by  small communities  and that produce high-quality ef-
         fluent.  Research  reconfirmed  that,  at recommended  filter rates  and  with  appropriate  me-
         dia and source water quality, slow sand  filtration can produce a low-turbidity effluent and
         can effectively remove microbiological contaminants.
           When the USEPA passed the Surface Water Treatment Rule (SWTR)  in  1989,  further
         pressure  was  placed on communities that were not filtering surface water supplies to add
         filtration.  Slow  sand  filters  were  rated  along  with  rapid  sand  and  DE  filters  as  baseline
         treatment  in  the  regulations.  As  a  result,  slow  sand  filtration  has  once  again  become  a
         treatment  method routinely considered in evaluating filtration options  in many U.S. com-
         munities.  Abroad,  it  is  used  to  provide  safe  drinking  water  to  many  poor  or rural  com-
         munities.  A  major  portion  of the  city  of  London  water  supply  is  treated  by  slow  sand
         filtration.
           Renewed interest in the slow sand  process  has  generated  new research into improving
         treatment  performance.  The  focus  has  been  on  expanding  use  of slow  sand  filtration  in
         treating poorer-quality source water, especially with higher turbidity  and organic content.


         Slow  Sand  Treatment  Mechanism

         As its name  implies, slow sand  filtration  is accomplished  by passing  water  at a relatively
         low  rate  through  a  sand  medium.  The  filtration  rate  is  on  the  order of one-hundredth  of
         the rate  used  in  a  typical rapid  sand  filter.
           Because of the relatively low filter rate, head loss across the bed occurs gradually over
         a  much  longer  time.  Average  filter run  length  is  normally  between  45  and  60  days.  In
         some newer  installations,  filter run  lengths  in  excess  of 6  months  and  even greater than
         1 year have been  reported.
           Slow  sand  filtration  accomplishes  its  treatment  primarily  through  biological activity,
         with  the  bulk  of this  activity taking  place on  the  surface  of the  sand  bed.  A  layer devel-
         ops  on  the  sand  surface  that  is  called  schmutzdecke,  an  accumulation  of organic  and  in-
         organic debris and particulate matter in which biological activity is stimulated.  It has been
   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231