Page 239 -
P. 239

SLOW SAND AND DIATOMACEOUS EARTH FILTRATION      9.15
           TABLE  9.4  Comparisons  of the Operation  of Slow Sand and GAC Sandwich  Filters

                  Parameter          Conventional  slow sand   GAC sandwich  filter
           Cleaning  frequency            30 days           No change
           Color removal                  20%               50%
           Total organic  carbon reduction   20%            35% to 40%
           Total trihalomethane  formation
             potential  reduction  (24-h
             contact time)                130/zg/L          60 g/L





        TOC  and  disinfection by-products  even further.  When  used  primarily  for the purpose  of
        organic reduction, the life of the GAC sandwich layer may be extended to 5 years or more.

        Filter Fabric.  In research  conducted  in  the  United  States  by  Collins  et  al.  (1989)  and
        in  England  by  Graham  et  al.  (1991),  a  synthetic,  nonwoven  fabric  installed  on  the  sand
        surface  was  shown  to  increase  filter run  lengths  while  maintaining  effective treatment.
        The benefit is that removal of suspended  particles occurs on the  fabric  with the intent of
        simplifying the cleaning process.
           When  one  is  specifying a  fabric,  parameters  to  be  considered  include  porosity,  spe-
        cific surface  area,  and  fabric  thickness.  Graham  et al.  (1991)  showed that  a  fabric  thick-
        ness  between  3,4 and  11,4 in.  (20  and  30  mm)  was  necessary  to  allow adequate  fabric  re-
        moval and cleaning and that fabrics with a  specific surface area between 4,000  and 4,500
        ft2/ft 3 (13,000  and  15,000  m2/m 3) provided optimal results.  They  also demonstrated  that
        use of fabric meeting this criterion increased filter run times by 400%  over those of a con-
        ventional filter.
           Issues  to  resolve before  filter fabric  is  used  involve the  mechanism  for  removal  and
        cleaning of the fabric, especially for large installations.  Further pilot studies may be war-
        ranted  to  determine  the  applicability  of this  modification with  source  waters  of varying
        quality.

        Filter Harrowing.   The  process  of harrrowing  filters  was  initially developed  as  a  filter
         cleaning method at the West Hartford, Connecticut,  slow sand filtration facility. The plant
         currently has 22 slow sand beds in operation with a capacity of 50 mgd (189 ML per day).
         Beds  vary  in  size between  1~ and  3,4 acre  (0.2  and  0.3  ha).  To  reduce  the  time  and  ex-
         pense  for cleaning,  the utility developed the process  of harrowing  filters in the  1950s.  In
         the process,  a  tractor with  a  mounted  spring-tooth  harrow  operates  within the bed  while
         water about 6  in.  (15  cm) deep  is flowing across  the  sand  surface.  The  harrow  breaks  up
         the top of the  filter surface,  and  water  carries  away  the  debris.  The  process  removes the
         accumulated  source water particulates  while maintaining  an active biological material  in
         the top  several inches  of the  sand.
           The process creates wastewater as the bed is being cleaned. The volume generated de-
         pends  on  source  water  quality,  filter area,  and  cross-flow velocity and  depth  and  is gen-
         erally in the range  of 40  to 60  gal/ft 2 (163  to  244  L/m 2) of filter area.
           The  experience at West Hartford has  shown that using  the harrowing process  reduces
         cleaning time to one-quarter of the time required for conventional cleaning.  The harrow-
         ing process  requires  the  following facilities  that  may  not  be  provided  for  a  convention-
         ally cleaned  slow sand  filter:
   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244