Page 236 -
P. 236

9.12                       CHAPTER NINE

         quality  and  filter run  lengths.  However,  based  on  concerns  about  microbiological conta-
         minants,  it is prudent to design filter rates conservatively to allow flexibility for future in-
         creased  treatment  requirements  and  fluctuating  demands  for water quantity  and  quality.
           One  design  approach  is to  allow  a  moderate  to  low rate,  even when  one filter is off-
         line  and  the  treatment  system  is  under  maximum  water  demand  conditions.  This  allows
         some flexibility to  meet future  increased  demands  without  capital  expenditures  and  pro-
         vides a  buffer  under  poor  source  water  quality  conditions.  This  approach  also increases
         initial capital  expenditures  because  of larger filter area requirements.
           Some  cost  savings  may  be  gained  by  allowing  on-line filters  to  operate  at high rates
         when  one unit is off-line, but research has  shown that even though the schmutzdecke  has
         been  established,  an  increase  in  filter rate  can  have  an  adverse  impact  on  treated  water
         quality.  The  higher rate  also results  in reduced  length of filter runs.
           A  compromise  approach  is  to  provide  moderate  flow rates  when  all  units  are  in  ser-
         vice.  Higher rates  result with one unit  off-line, but  only for  short  periods.  This provides
         flexibility  when  dealing  with  water  quality  and  demand  issues  and  reduces  capital
         expenditures.

         Automation.   Slow sand filtration plants can require much simpler automation than other
         filtration processes.  But to  some degree, the level of automation  is driven by regulations
         and the client.  For automation,  the design  must  consider

         •  State  and  federal regulations
         •  Initial cost and  operating  costs
         •  Level of complexity desired by  client and  operator
         •  Work  shifts  to be  used
         •  Source  water  quality  fluctuations
         •  Record-keeping  needs  and  requirements
         •  Critical  plant  parameters  and  equipment
           The  recommended  minimum  location points  for recording  and  monitoring  include
         •  Source  water turbidity
         •  Source  water flow
         •  Filter level
         •  Filtered  water flow and  head  loss  (individual)
         •  Filtered water  turbidity  (individual  or combined)
         •  Chlorine  residual  (before  and  after storage)
         •  Finished  water  flow
         •  Finished  water  storage level
           Other monitoring points may be specific to each site's requirements and should be dis-
         cussed  with  the  client.


         Pilot Testing
         The  most  advantageous  way  of determining  the  applicability of a  treatment  process  to a
         specific source water  and the performance  that  may be expected is through  pilot studies.
         In  fact,  reliable  prediction  of treatment  results  is  difficult  without  pilot  testing.  The  re-
   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241